Constraints and Ambiguity: Some Design Strategies for Supporting Small-scale Creativity in the Classroom

Developing creative abilities is an important part of 21st century skills, and yet remains challenging. In this paper1 we describe a study investigating small-scale creative strategies that groups of Scandinavian high school students use when collaboratively building LEGO models. We recorded thirty groups of students building three models each. We studied groups building with traditional plastic bricks and also using a digital environment. The building tasks students undertake, and our subsequent analysis, are informed by the role constraints and ambiguity play in creative processes. Based on the insights we gained, we present three strategies for designing tools and environments that support students as they develop creative skills. These strategies relate to: tools and materials, mutual learning, and reflection.

[1]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: an empirical study , 2008 .

[2]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[3]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[4]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An , 2022 .

[5]  Canterbury Christ Church.  Exploring the conceptual space of LEGO : Teaching and learning the psychology of creativity , 2003 .

[6]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Embodied Interaction: Language And Body In The Material World , 2014 .

[7]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  An Introduction to 'Creativity Constraints' , 2013 .

[8]  Kim Halskov,et al.  An Argument For Design Space Reflection , 2016, NordiCHI.

[9]  Weiping Hu,et al.  Increasing Students' Scientific Creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program , 2013 .

[10]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[11]  Bernard Roth,et al.  Student Teams in Search of Design Thinking , 2014 .

[12]  Holly Willis,et al.  Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking , 2011 .

[13]  Janet McDonnell,et al.  Impositions of order: A comparison between design and fine art practices , 2011 .

[14]  Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch,et al.  Supportive Classroom Environments For Creativity in Higher Education , 1999 .

[15]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design , 2014, Digit. Creativity.

[16]  R L Craik,et al.  Tolerance of Ambiguity , 2021, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[17]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity: Constraints on Creativity , 2010 .

[18]  Rachel Charlotte Smith,et al.  Design thinking for digital fabrication in education , 2015, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[19]  Charles K. Fadel,et al.  21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times , 2009 .

[20]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[21]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  Against Ambiguity , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Provoking Creativity: Imagine What Your Requirements Could Be Like , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[23]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Information, Inspiration and Co-creation , 2005 .

[24]  Jon Elster,et al.  Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints , 2000 .

[25]  R. Strom,et al.  Changing the Rules: Education for Creative Thinking , 2002 .

[26]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Reshaping the box: creative designing as constraint management , 2010 .

[27]  A. Aljughaiman,et al.  Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity and Creative Students. , 2005 .

[28]  J. Guilford.  Creative abilities in the arts. , 1957, Psychological review.

[29]  M. Field.  Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity , 1996 .

[30]  Philip Ewart Vernon.  Creativity: selected readings , 1970 .

[31]  Sara Jones,et al.  Using data to stimulate creative thinking in the design of new products and services , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[32]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity , 2009 .