Identification of cohesive and adhesive effects in the cleaning of food fouling deposits

Abstract Cleaning of process plants is costly and time consuming. It is important to understand the removal of fouling deposits. Deposits form by adhesion to the surface and cohesion between elements of the deposit. Cleaning can result from either or both adhesive and cohesive failure. Micromanipulation experiments have measured the adhesive/cohesive strength of deposits in terms of the work required to remove them from the surface. Different food deposits have been studied. Tomato paste, bread dough and egg albumin deposits have a lower adhesive than cohesive strength, whilst others (whey protein) have a lower cohesive than adhesive strength. A range of coated surfaces has been used to study the effect of surface energy on the force required for removal of tomato deposits. Minima are found, as predicted by theory. A simple material model has been developed and used to analyse the results in terms of the work required to remove the deposit per unit surface area and volume. Industrial relevance Cleaning is a ubiquitous and poorly understood operation in the food industry. Poor cleaning endangers product safety, lowers run length and generates excess effluent. Better understanding of the processes of cleaning is beneficial both in ensuring food safety and in increasing the manufacturing efficiency of process plant.

[1]  T. R. Bott Fouling of Heat Exchangers , 1995 .

[2]  Hans Müller-Steinhagen,et al.  Investigation of low fouling surface alloys made by ion implantation technology , 1997 .

[3]  Qi Zhao,et al.  Modification of stainless steel surfaces by electroless Ni-P and small amount of PTFE to minimize bacterial adhesion , 2006 .

[4]  Hans Müller-Steinhagen,et al.  Graded Ni-P-PTFE coatings and their potential applications , 2002 .

[5]  G. Bitton,et al.  Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. , 1980 .

[6]  R. Benning,et al.  Hybrid model of the fouling process in tubular heat exchangers for the dairy industry , 2002 .

[7]  G. K. Christian,et al.  Direct measurement of the force required to disrupt and remove fouling deposits of whey protein concentrate , 2006 .

[8]  Hans Müller-Steinhagen,et al.  Tailored surface free energy of membrane diffusers to minimize microbial adhesion , 2004 .

[9]  L. Melo,et al.  Calcium phosphate deposition from simulated milk ultrafiltrate on different stainless steel-based surfaces , 2006 .

[10]  N. Andritsos,et al.  Modified stainless steel surfaces targeted to reduce fouling––surface characterization , 2004 .

[11]  Peter J. Fryer,et al.  Quantification of the cleaning of egg albumin deposits using micromanipulation and direct observation techniques , 2007 .

[12]  G. K. Christian,et al.  Development and Use of a Micromanipulation Technique for Measuring the Force Required to Disrupt and Remove Fouling Deposits , 2002 .

[13]  Peter de Jong,et al.  Reduction of fouling and contamination by predictive kinetic models , 2002 .

[14]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfaces , 1986 .

[15]  T. R. Bott,et al.  Direct measurement of the adhesive strength of biofilms in pipes by micromanipulation , 1998 .