Seismic reliability of 3D base-isolated structures through FPS with elastic superstructure

The friction pendulum system (FPS) is becoming a widely used technique for seismic protection and retrofit of buildings, bridges and industrial structures. Experimental data also showed that the coefficient of friction depends on several effects (i.e., sliding velocity, apparent pressure, air temperature, cycling effect) so that it can be assumed as a random variable. The aim of the study consists in evaluating the seismic reliability of a 3D base-isolated structure with FP isolators considering both isolator properties (i.e., coefficient of friction) and earthquake main characteristics as random variables. Assuming appropriate density probability functions for each random variable and adopting the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method for random sampling, the input data set has been defined. Several 3D non-linear dynamic analyses have been performed in order to evaluate the system response. In particular, monovariate and multivariate (joint) probability density and cumulative distribution functions have been computed and, considering the limit state thresholds and domains (performance objectives) assumed as earthquake damage parameter (EDP) according to performance-based seismic design, the exceeding probabilities (structural performances) have been evaluated. Estimating the reliability of the superstructure, substructure and isolation level led to define and propose reliability-based abacus and equations useful to design the FP system.

[1]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  Reliability of base isolation for the protection of critical equipment from earthquake hazards , 2005 .

[2]  R. S. Jangid Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems , 2000 .

[3]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Response of frictional base isolation systems to horizontal-vertical random earthquake excitations , 1988 .

[4]  Jianyun Chen,et al.  Numerical simulation and investigation of the base isolated NPPC building under three-directional seismic loading , 2013 .

[5]  C. Cornell,et al.  Disaggregation of seismic hazard , 1999 .

[6]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[7]  Paolo Castaldo,et al.  Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings , 2015 .

[8]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance of Seismic Isolation Hardware under Service and Seismic Loading , 2007 .

[9]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi‐directional ground motions , 1986 .

[10]  Weiqing Liu,et al.  Stochastic Seismic Response and Reliability Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures , 2007 .

[11]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[12]  Qian Wang,et al.  Integrated Reliability-Based Seismic Drift Design Optimization of Base-Isolated Concrete Buildings , 2010 .

[13]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation I: Testing , 1990 .

[14]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators , 2003 .

[15]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[16]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Performance‐based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach , 2002 .

[17]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  A Simple Pendulum Technique for Achieving Seismic Isolation , 1990 .

[18]  Maurice Bryson,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers , 1997, Technometrics.

[19]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Random response analysis of frictional base isolation system , 1990 .