Changes in wheelchair biomechanics within the first 120 minutes of practice: spatiotemporal parameters, handrim forces, motor force, rolling resistance and fore-aft stability

Abstract Purpose: During manual wheelchair (MWC) skill acquisition, users adapt their propulsion technique through changes in biomechanical parameters. This evolution is assumed to be driven towards a more efficient behavior. However, when no specific training protocol is provided to users, little is known about how they spontaneously adapt during overground MWC locomotion. For that purpose, we investigated this biomechanical spontaneous adaptation within the initial phase of low-intensity uninstructed training. Materials and methods: Eighteen novice able-bodied subjects were enrolled to perform 120 min of uninstructed practice with a field MWC, distributed over 4 weeks. Subjects were tested during the very first minutes of the program, and after completion of the entire training protocol. Spatiotemporal parameters, handrim forces, motor force, rolling resistance and fore-aft stability were investigated using an instrumented field wheelchair. Results: Participants rapidly increased linear velocity of the MWC, thanks to a higher propulsive force. This was achieved thanks to higher handrim forces, combined with an improved fraction of effective force for startup but not for propulsion. Despite changes in mechanical actions exerted by the user on the MWC, rolling resistance remained constant but the stability index was noticeably altered. Conclusion: Even if no indication is given, novice MWC users rapidly change their propulsion technique and increase their linear speed. Such improvements in MWC mobility are allowed by a mastering of the whole range of stability offered by the MWC, which raises the issue of safety on the MWC. Implications for rehabilitation The learning process of manual wheelchair locomotion induces adaptations for novice users, who change their propulsion technique to improve their mobility. Several wheelchair biomechanical parameters change during the learning process, especially wheelchair speed, handrim forces, motor force, rolling resistance and fore-aft stability. Fore-aft stability on the wheelchair rapidly reached the tipping limits for users. Technical solutions that preserve stability but do not hinder mobility have to beimplemented, for instance by adding anti-tipping wheels rather than moving the seat forwards with respect to the rear wheels axle.

[1]  V L Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  Hand-rim Forces and Gross Mechanical Efficiency at Various Frequencies of Wheelchair Propulsion , 2012, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  Rory A. Cooper,et al.  Design and Development of a Lightweight, Durable, Adjustable Composite Backrest Mounting , 2011 .

[3]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion hand pattern on upper extremity muscle power and stress. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R A Cooper,et al.  Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Guillaume Desroches,et al.  Unmatched speed perceptions between overground and treadmill manual wheelchair propulsion in long-term manual wheelchair users. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[6]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  BIOMECHANICS OF WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION , 2009 .

[7]  F. Lavaste,et al.  Proposal of an index for evaluating pitch instability during actual locomotion with a manual wheelchair , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[8]  Christophe Sauret,et al.  Effects of user's actions on rolling resistance and wheelchair stability during handrim wheelchair propulsion in the field. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Early motor learning changes in upper-limb dynamics and shoulder complex loading during handrim wheelchair propulsion , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Riemer J. K. Vegter,et al.  Initial Skill Acquisition of Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion: A New Perspective , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Effect of wheelchair mass, tire type and tire pressure on physical strain and wheelchair propulsion technique. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  The manual wheelchair wheelie: A review of our current understanding of an important motor skill , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[13]  Riemer J. K. Vegter,et al.  Inter-Individual Differences in the Initial 80 Minutes of Motor Learning of Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Philippe Vaslin,et al.  Zeroing of six-component handrim dynamometer for biomechanical studies of manual wheelchair locomotion , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[16]  G. Legnani,et al.  A homogeneous matrix approach to 3D kinematics and dynamics — I. Theory , 1996 .

[17]  Aaron L. Souza,et al.  Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Filter frequency selection for manual wheelchair biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  W X Yao,et al.  The effect of variable practice on wheelchair propulsive efficiency and propulsive timing. , 2012, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  F Lavaste,et al.  Computation of the mechanical power of a manual wheelchair user in actual conditions: preliminary results , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Influence of trunk flexion on biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  R. Adkins,et al.  Effects of reduction in shoulder pain on quality of life and community activities among people living long-term with SCI paraplegia: a randomized control trial , 2011, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[23]  B S Mason,et al.  Influence of wheel configuration on wheelchair basketball performance: wheel stiffness, tyre type and tyre orientation. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Wheelchair propulsion technique and mechanical efficiency after 3 wk of practice. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Philippe Vaslin,et al.  Dynamic calibration of a wheelchair six-component wheel dynamometer rolling on the floor , 2011 .

[26]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Seat height: effects on submaximal hand rim wheelchair performance during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[27]  N Louis,et al.  Wheelchair propulsion kinematics in beginners and expert users: influence of wheelchair settings. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  K N An,et al.  A comparison of methods to compute the point of force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion: a technical note. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  Philippe Vaslin,et al.  A self-contained wireless wheelchair ergometer designed for biomechanical measures in real life conditions , 2004 .

[30]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  V L Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  Influence of varied tempo music on wheelchair mechanical efficiency following 3-week practice. , 2011, International journal of sports medicine.

[32]  L. Olmos,et al.  Wheelchair axle position effect on start-up propulsion performance of persons with tetraplegia. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  Paolo Righettini,et al.  A homogeneous matrix approach to 3D kinematics and dynamics—II. Applications to chains of rigid bodies and serial manipulators , 1996 .

[34]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effectiveness of force application in manual wheelchair propulsion in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  Samuel Hybois,et al.  Shoulder kinetics during start-up and propulsion with a manual wheelchair within the initial phase of uninstructed training , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[36]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  Redefining the manual wheelchair stroke cycle: identification and impact of nonpropulsive pushrim contact. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  L H V van der Woude,et al.  Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[38]  Philip Requejo,et al.  Effect of Fore-Aft Seat Position on Shoulder Demands During Wheelchair Propulsion: Part 1. A Kinetic Analysis , 2005, The journal of spinal cord medicine.