Effect of milk yield characteristics, breed, and parity on success of the first insemination in Dutch dairy cows.

The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of cow factors to the probability of a successful first insemination (SFI). The investigation was performed with 51,791 lactations from 1,396 herds obtained from the Dutch dairy cow database of the Cattle Improvement Co-operative (CRV). Cows that had the first insemination (AI) between 40 and 150 d postpartum were selected. The first AI was classified as successful when cows were not reinseminated and either calved between 267 and 295 d later or were culled within 135 to 295 d after first AI. The lactation curve characteristics of individual lactations were estimated by Wilmink's curve using the test-day milk records from CRV. The lactation curve characteristics (peak milk yield, milk yield at the first-AI date, time of peak yield (PT), and milk persistency) were calculated. Breed, parity, interval from calving to first AI (CFI), lactation curve characteristics, milk production traits, moment of AI related to PT (before or after PT), calf status, month of AI, and month of calving were selected as independent variables for a model with SFI as a dependent variable. A multivariable logistic regression model was used with farm as a random effect. Overall SFI was 44%. The effect of parity on SFI depended on CFI. The first-parity cows had the greatest SFI (0.43) compared with other parities (0.32-0.39) at the same period of CFI before 60 d in milk (DIM), and cows in parity ≥5 had the least SFI (0.38-0.40) when AI was after 60 DIM. After 60 DIM, extending CFI did not improve SFI in the first-parity cows, but SFI was improved in multiparous cows. Holstein-Friesian cows had lesser SFI (0.37) compared with cross-breed cows (0.39-0.46). Twin and stillbirth calving reduced SFI (0.39) compared with a single female calf (0.45) or a male calf (0.43) calving. The SFI in different months of AI varied and depended on CFI. Cows that received AI before 60 DIM had a lesser SFI, especially in March, June, and July (0.18, 0.35, and 0.34, respectively). Artificial insemination before PT reduced SFI (0.39) in comparison with AI after PT (0.44). The effect of milk yield at the first-AI date on SFI varied depending on CFI. After 60 DIM at the same period of CFI, a high level of milk yield at the first-AI date reduced SFI. In conclusion, knowledge of the contribution of cow factors on SFI can be applied to support decision making on the moment of insemination of an individual cow in estrus.

[1]  R F Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic relationships among body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility in dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  W R Butler,et al.  Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Linear and threshold model genetic parameters for disease, fertility and milk production in dairy cattle , 2000 .

[4]  R. Miller,et al.  Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  M. Lucy,et al.  Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J. Jensen,et al.  © American Dairy Science Association, 2007. Breed and Parity Effects on Energy Balance Profiles Through Lactation: Evidence of Genetically Driven Body Energy Change , 2007 .

[7]  K. Pierce,et al.  Effects of breed and feeding system on milk production, body weight, body condition score, reproductive performance, and postpartum ovarian function. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Effect of gestation stage on milk yield and composition in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle , 1997 .

[9]  A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Use of AI technician scores for body condition, uterine tone and uterine discharge in a model with disease and milk production parameters to predict pregnancy risk at first AI in Holstein dairy cows. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[10]  I Misztal,et al.  Bivariate analysis of conception rates and test-day milk yields in Holsteins using a threshold-linear model with random regressions. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  Helen Brown,et al.  Applied Mixed Models in Medicine , 2000, Technometrics.

[12]  M P L Calus,et al.  Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  R. Labouriau,et al.  Probability of pregnancy as affected by oestrus number and days to first oestrus in dairy cows of three breeds and parities. , 2010, Animal reproduction science.

[14]  J. Mee,et al.  Relationships among milk yield, body condition, cow weight, and reproduction in spring-calved Holstein-Friesians. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  G. Simm,et al.  The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  D. Berry,et al.  Body condition score and body weight effects on dystocia and stillbirths and consequent effects on postcalving performance. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  T. Yan,et al.  Effects of dairy cow genotype with two planes of nutrition on energy partitioning between milk and body tissue. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Reproductive parameters and efficiency of inseminators in dairy farms in Portugal. , 2001, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[19]  M. Kinsel,et al.  Factors affecting reproductive performance in Ontario dairy herds. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[20]  J.B.M. Wilmink,et al.  Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation , 1987 .

[21]  P. Pinedo,et al.  The association between reproductive performance and milk yield in Chilean Holstein cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  J. K. Bertrand,et al.  Environmental effects on conception rates of Holsteins in New York and Georgia. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Influence of stage of lactation and milk production on conception rates after timed artificial insemination following Ovsynch. , 2003, Theriogenology.

[24]  B. Muir,et al.  Genetic relationships between persistency and reproductive performance in first-lactation Canadian holsteins. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  J. Barnouin,et al.  Risk factors for stillbirth in Holstein heifers under field conditions in France: a prospective survey. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[27]  Y. Gröhn,et al.  The association between cumulative milk yield, days open, and days to first breeding in New York Holstein cows. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.