Effects of Similarity in Bandwidth on the Auditory Sequential Streaming of Two-Tone Complexes

We investigated the perceptual grouping of sequentially presented sounds—auditory stream segregation. It is well established that sounds heard as more similar in quality, or timbre, are more likely to be grouped into the same auditory stream. However, it is often unclear exactly what acoustic factors determine timbre. In this study, we presented various sequences of simple sounds, each comprising two frequency components (two-tone complexes), and measured their perceptual grouping. We varied only one parameter between trials, the intercomponent separation for some of the complexes, and examined the effects on stream segregation. Four hypotheses are presented that might predict the extent of streaming. Specifically, least streaming might be expected when the sounds were most similar in either (1) the frequency regions in which they have energy (maximum spectral overlap), (2) their auditory bandwidths, (3) their relative bandwidths, or (4) the rate at which the two components beat together (intermodulation rate). It was found that least streaming occurred when sounds were most similar in either their auditory or their relative bandwidths. Although these two hypotheses could not be distinguished, the results were clearly different from those predicted by hypotheses (1) and (4). The implications for models of stream segregation are discussed.

[1]  A S Bregman,et al.  Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency. , 1990, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  David Wessel,et al.  Timbre Space as a Musical Control Structure , 1979 .

[3]  F. Lerdahl,et al.  Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: The influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .

[5]  A. King,et al.  Auditory function: Neurobiological bases of hearing G.M. Edelman W.E. , 1990, Neuroscience.

[6]  Michael J. Denham,et al.  A Model of Auditory Streaming , 1995, NIPS.

[7]  L. V. Noorden Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[8]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation , 1976 .

[9]  P. Iverson,et al.  Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[11]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Analytic and synthetic pitch of two-tone complexes. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Møller Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  William W. Gaver How Do We Hear in the World?: Explorations in Ecological Acoustics , 1993 .

[14]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones , 1983, Hearing Research.

[15]  T. Houtgast Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R. Meddis,et al.  A Computer Model of Auditory Stream Segregation , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. , 1985 .

[19]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  J. Grey Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  P G Singh Perceptual organization of complex-tone sequences: a tradeoff between pitch and timbre? , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  M. Scheffers Simulation of auditory analysis of pitch: an elaboration on the DWS pitch meter. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  R. Kay Hearing of modulation in sounds. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[24]  R. Plomp,et al.  Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[26]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[27]  R Cusack,et al.  Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  A S Bregman,et al.  The influence of different timbre attributes on the perceptual segregation of complex-tone sequences. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Douglas Johnson,et al.  Stream Segregation and Peripheral Channeling , 1991 .

[30]  G. Von Bismarck,et al.  Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds , 1974 .

[31]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Neuronal correlates of perceptual amplitude-modulation detection , 1995, Hearing Research.