Feasibility of a Computer-Delivered Driver Safety Behavior Screening and Intervention Program Initiated During an Emergency Department Visit

Objectives: Injuries from motor vehicle crashes are a significant public health problem. The emergency department (ED) provides a setting that may be used to screen for behaviors that increase risk for motor vehicle crashes and provide brief interventions to people who might otherwise not have access to screening and intervention. The purpose of the present study was to (1) assess the feasibility of using a computer-assisted screening program to educate ED patients about risky driving behaviors, (2) evaluate patient acceptance of the computer-based traffic safety educational intervention during an ED visit, and (3) assess postintervention changes in risky driving behaviors. Methods: Pre/posteducational intervention involving medically stable adult ED patients in a large urban academic ED serving over 100,000 patients annually. Patients completed a self-administered, computer-based program that queried patients on risky driving behaviors (texting, talking, and other forms of distracted driving) and alcohol use. The computer provided patients with educational information on the dangers of these behaviors and data were collected on patient satisfaction with the program. Staff called patients 1 month post-ED visit for a repeat query. Results: One hundred forty-nine patients participated, and 111 completed 1-month follow up (75%); the mean age was 39 (range: 21–70), 59 percent were Hispanic, and 52 percent were male. Ninety-seven percent of patients reported that the program was easy to use and that they were comfortable receiving this education via computer during their ED visit. All driving behaviors significantly decreased in comparison to baseline with the following reductions reported: talking on the phone, 30 percent; aggressive driving, 30 percent; texting while driving, 19 percent; drowsy driving, 16 percent; driving while multitasking, 12 percent; and drinking and driving, 9 percent. Conclusions: Overall, patients were very satisfied receiving educational information about these behaviors via computer during their ED visits and found the program easy to use. We found a high prevalence of self-reported risky driving behaviors in our ED population. At 1-month follow-up, patients reported a significant decrease in these behaviors. This study indicates that a low-intensity, computer-based educational intervention during an ED visit may be a useful approach to educate patients about safe driving behaviors and safe drinking limits and help promote behavior change. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Traffic Injury Prevention to view the supplemental file.

[1]  G. D’Onofrio,et al.  Preventive care in the emergency department: screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems in the emergency department: a systematic review. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  H. W. Clark,et al.  Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later. , 2009, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[4]  G. D’Onofrio,et al.  Screening and Brief Intervention in the Emergency Department , 2004, Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

[5]  C. Camargo,et al.  Emergency Department Initiated Treatments for Tobacco (EDITT): A Pilot Study , 2008, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[6]  E. Boudreaux,et al.  The impact of screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment in emergency department patients' alcohol use: a 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. , 2010, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[7]  R. Korcha,et al.  Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): 12-month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial in a Polish emergency department. , 2010, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[8]  Jim P. Stimpson,et al.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[9]  P. Bijur,et al.  Feasibility of a computer-assisted alcohol SBIRT program in an urban emergency department: patient and research staff perspectives , 2013, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice.

[10]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Project ASSERT: an ED-based intervention to increase access to primary care, preventive services, and the substance abuse treatment system. , 1997, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  Laurie F. Beck,et al.  Vital signs: nonfatal, motor vehicle--occupant injuries (2009) and seat belt use (2008) among adults --- United States. , 2011, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  F. Vaca,et al.  Six-Month Follow-Up of Computerized Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in the Emergency Department , 2011, Substance abuse.

[13]  T. Weiland,et al.  Emergency clinician‐delivered screening and intervention for high‐risk alcohol use: A qualitative analysis , 2008, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[14]  P. Bijur,et al.  A randomized trial of a multicomponent cessation strategy for emergency department smokers. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  H. Tavakoli,et al.  Review of current clinical biomarkers for the detection of alcohol dependence. , 2011, Innovations in clinical neuroscience.