Perception of socket alignment perturbations in amputees with transtibial prostheses.

A person with amputation's subjective perception is the only tool available to describe fit and comfort to a prosthetist. However, few studies have investigated the effect of alignment on this perception. The aim of this article is to determine whether people with amputation could perceive the alignment perturbations of their prostheses and effectively communicate them. A randomized controlled perturbation of angular (3 and 6 degrees) and translational (5 and 10 mm) alignments in the sagittal (flexion, extension, and anterior and posterior translations) and coronal (abduction, adduction, and medial and lateral translations) planes were induced from an aligned condition in 11 subjects with transtibial prostheses. The perception was evaluated when standing (static) and immediately after walking (dynamic) using software that used a visual analog scale under each alignment condition. In the coronal plane, Friedman test demonstrated general statistical differences in static (p < 0.001) and dynamic (p < 0.001) measures of perceptions with angular perturbations. In the sagittal plane, it also demonstrated general statistical differences in late-stance dynamic measures of perceptions (p < 0.001) with angular perturbations, as well as in early-stance dynamic measures of perceptions (p < 0.05) with translational perturbations. Fisher exact test suggested that people with amputation's perceptions were good indicators for coronal angle malalignments but less reliable when defining other alignment conditions.

[1]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  The effect of prosthetic alignment on relative limb loading in persons with trans-tibial amputation: a preliminary report. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  John G Buckley,et al.  Oxygen consumption during ambulation: comparison of using a prosthesis fitted with and without a tele-torsion device. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Helga Wild,et al.  Lower-limb amputee needs assessment using multistakeholder focus-group approach. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  W V James Principles of limb fitting and prostheses. , 1991, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[6]  David A Boone,et al.  Quantification of prosthetic outcomes: elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Morrison Jb,et al.  Prostheses alignment: effect on gait of persons with below-knee amputations. , 1984 .

[8]  David Alan Boone Investigation of socket reactions from transtibial prosthesis malalignment , 2005 .

[9]  Eugene M. Burgess Amputation Surgery and Rehabilitation: The Toronto Experience , 1982 .

[10]  Janice J Eng,et al.  A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  John P. Kostuik,et al.  Amputation surgery and rehabilitation : the Toronto experience , 1981 .

[12]  A. E. Chapman,et al.  Prostheses alignment: effect on gait of persons with below-knee amputations. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  V. C. Roberts,et al.  Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans-tibial stump with a prosthesis. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Sandra J. Olney,et al.  Effect of the Weight of Prosthetic Components on the Gait of Transtibial Amputees , 2004 .

[15]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  D Datta,et al.  Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: User's verdict , 1998, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[17]  J. P. Paul,et al.  Alignment of lower-limb prostheses. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  S. Wolf,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[19]  David Alan Boone,et al.  Use of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) , 2006 .

[20]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Perception of Walking Difficulty by Below-Knee Amputees Using a Conventional Foot Versus the Flex-Foot , 1991 .