Analysing the wind turbine innovation systems in The Netherlands and Denmark using the cyclic innovation model

This paper analyses the development of wind power in The Netherlands and Denmark in the period 1973-2000 with the cyclic innovation model (CIM). CIM regards innovation as a cyclic process in which different actors constantly develop and exchange knowledge through four different types of cycles: hard science cycle, soft science cycle, integrated engineering cycle, and differentiated valorisation cycle. The actors are located in four 'nodes': scientific exploration, technological research, product creation, and market transitions. In the centre of CIM is the 'system entrepreneur' who is responsible for the managerial tasks within the innovation system. Our main conclusion is that in the wind power case in The Netherlands, the knowledge cycles were not complete. For too long, science and technology were not connected well enough to society and market. The Danish wind power case shows initially separated development paths, but these gradually merged together, which resulted in a complete and well-functioning innovation system. The notion of the system entrepreneur is found to be less helpful for the analysis of these cases.

[1]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[4]  P. Gipe.  Wind Energy Comes of Age , 1995 .

[5]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[6]  Matthias Heymann,et al.  Signs of Hubris: The Shaping of Wind Technology Styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940-1990 , 1998 .

[7]  van Qc Rinie Est,et al.  Winds of change: A comparative study of the politics of wind energy innovation in California and Denmark , 1999 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[9]  Ruud Smits,et al.  Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2004 .

[10]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[11]  George Marsh,et al.  Tilting at windmills , 2005 .

[12]  F. Geels.  Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[14]  Roland Ortt,et al.  The Cyclic Innovation Model: A New Challenge for a Regional Approach to Innovation Systems? , 2007 .

[15]  Patrick van der Duin,et al.  New ways of innovation: an application of the cyclic innovation model to the mobile telecom industry , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  John Grin,et al.  Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability , 2007 .

[17]  Maaike C. Kroon,et al.  Toward a Sustainable Chemical Industry: Cyclic Innovation Applied to Ionic Liquid-Based Technology , 2008 .

[18]  Linda M. Kamp,et al.  Socio-technical analysis of the introduction of wind power in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2008 .

[19]  A. R. Jha,et al.  Wind Turbine Technology , 2010 .