Aggregation of Stakeholder Preferences in Sustainable Forest Management using AHP

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is the most often applied approach to modelling strategic forest management problems. When dealing with Multiple Criteria Decision Making, AHP allows one to take social, economic and environmental criteria of sustainability concept, as well as public participation, into account. We carried out a workshop to validate a decision hierarchy for Sustainable Management in Mediterranean forests, as well as two surveys to elicit social priorities. Stakeholder and expert judgments were integrated using the geometric mean to obtain group preferences. We applied this method to develop empirical research into sustainable forest management in a Mediterranean region, where the environmental and social services of the forest are more important than the economic ones. We quantified weights of criteria, objectives and management strategy priorities and discuss the obtained results.

[1]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Aggregation of preferences in participatory forest planning with multiple criteria: an application to the urban forest in Lycksele, Sweden , 2009 .

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory , 2000 .

[3]  Jayanath Ananda Implementing Participatory Decision Making in Forest Planning , 2007, Environmental management.

[4]  A. Weintraub,et al.  Forest management challenges for operational researchers , 1998 .

[5]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[6]  Ninni Saarinen,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland , 2010 .

[7]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[8]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land-use planning , 2008 .

[9]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment , 2008 .

[10]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[11]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Structures in decision making: On the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: An application to two public forests in Spain , 2009 .

[14]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[15]  Dae-Young Choi,et al.  Aggregation of Preferences Based on FSAM , 2005, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs , 2002, Oper. Res..