Two Components of Long-Distance Extraction: Successive Cyclicity in Dinka

This article presents novel data from the Nilotic language Dinka, in which the syntax of successive-cyclic movement is remarkably transparent. We show that Dinka provides strong support for the view that long-distance extraction proceeds through the edge of every verb phrase and every clause on the path of movement (Chomsky 1986, 2000, 2001, 2008). In addition, long-distance dependencies in Dinka offer evidence that extraction from a CP requires agreement between v and the CP that is extracted from (Rackowski and Richards 2005, Den Dikken 2009b, 2012a,b). The claim that both of these components constrain long-distance movement is important, as much contemporary work on extraction incorporates only one of them. To accommodate this conclusion, we propose a modification of Rackowski and Richards 2005, in which both intermediate movement and Agree relations between phase heads are necessary steps in establishing a long-distance dependency.

[1]  M. Diesing Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish , 1990 .

[2]  Torben Andersen,et al.  Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka , 2002 .

[3]  N. Richards,et al.  Phase Edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case Study , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[4]  Noam Chomsky Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 1964 .

[5]  Seth Cable The Grammar of Q , 2010 .

[6]  Esther Torrego Salcedo On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects , 1984 .

[7]  Karlos Arregi,et al.  Clausal Pied-Piping , 2003 .

[8]  R. Bhatt Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu , 2005 .

[9]  David Pesetsky,et al.  T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[10]  James Mccloskey Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Perspectives on phases , 2005 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Problems of projection , 2013 .

[13]  Seth Cable,et al.  The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping , 2010 .

[14]  Robert Freidin,et al.  Foundational issues in linguistic theory : essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , 2008 .

[15]  F. Cozier,et al.  The Co-occurrence of Predicate Clefting and WH-Questions in Trinidad Dialectal English , 2006 .

[16]  Job Malou,et al.  Dinka vowel system , 1988 .

[17]  Spatial roles and verbal directionality in Dinka , 2012 .

[18]  Gosse Bouma,et al.  Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction , 2001 .

[19]  Hisatsugu Kitahara,et al.  Elementary operations and optimal derivations , 1997 .

[20]  David Willis,et al.  The limits of resumption in Welsh wh-dependencies , 2011 .

[21]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[23]  N. Richards The Principle of Minimal Compliance , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Susanne Wurmbrand,et al.  Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure , 2001 .

[25]  Gereon Müller,et al.  A constraint on remnant movement , 1996 .

[26]  Alexei Kochetov,et al.  Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 2005 .

[27]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[28]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Dimensions of Movement: From features to remnants , 2002 .

[29]  Torben Andersen The Phonemic System of Agar Dinka , 1987 .

[30]  Gary Thoms,et al.  Ellipsis, Economy, and the (Non)uniformity of Traces , 2016, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Luis Vicente,et al.  Licensing Objects with and without Movement , 2005 .

[32]  G. Müller Incomplete category fronting : a derivational approach to remnant movement in German , 1998 .

[33]  Claire Halpert Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu , 2012 .

[34]  Bert Remijsen,et al.  Why are three-level vowel length systems rare? Insights from Dinka (Luanyjang dialect) , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax , 1998 .

[36]  S. Cable,et al.  The grammar of Q : Q-particles and the nature of Wh-fronting, as revealed by the Wh-questions of Tlingit , 2007 .

[37]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Foot features and parasitic gaps , 1984 .

[38]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik , 2000 .

[39]  Tim Hunter A Constraint on Remnant Movement , 2011 .

[40]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Parameters and functional heads : essays in comparative syntax , 1996 .

[41]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Remnant stranding and the theory of movement , 2002 .

[42]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[43]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .

[44]  A. Goldberg Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[45]  D. Fox Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[46]  A. Nebel,et al.  Dinka grammar (Rek-Malual dialect) with texts and vocabulary , 1948 .

[47]  Alain Rouveret Phasal Agreement and Reconstruction , 2008 .

[48]  James N. Collins Samoan predicate initial word order and object positions , 2016, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[49]  eljko Bokovi On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[50]  Mary-Louise Kean,et al.  The theory of markedness in generative grammar , 1980 .

[51]  Current topics in English and Japanese , 1994 .

[52]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[53]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[54]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[55]  Vicki Carstens,et al.  Radical Defectivity: Implications of Xhosa Expletive Constructions , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.

[56]  James McCloskey,et al.  Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations , 2008 .

[57]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps , 1987 .

[58]  Ora Matushansky,et al.  Proceedings of the 1st HUMIT Student Conference in Language Research (HUMIT 2000) , 2001 .

[59]  Seth Cable,et al.  The optionality of movement and EPP in Dholuo , 2012 .

[60]  Jeremy Fine Hartman,et al.  VARIETIES OF CLAUSAL COMPLEMENTATION , 2012 .

[61]  Torben Andersen Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection , 1993, Phonology.

[62]  Omer Preminger Agreement as a fallible operation , 2011 .

[63]  Željko Bošković,et al.  A–movement and the EPP , 2002 .

[64]  Ken Hiraiwa,et al.  Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese * , 2002 .

[65]  Željko Bošković,et al.  On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory , 2007 .

[66]  M. Baltin,et al.  Alternative conceptions of phrase structure , 1990 .

[67]  Jonathan W. Nissenbaum,et al.  Investigations of covert phrase movement , 2000 .

[68]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[69]  Alain Rouveret,et al.  Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces , 2011 .

[70]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[71]  Torben Andersen Subject and topic in Dinka , 1991 .