The Hounsfield value for cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus—an in vitro study

IntroductionFractures of the proximal humerus represent a major osteoporotic burden. Recent developments in CT imaging have emphasized the importance of cortical bone thickness distribution in the prevention and management of fragility fractures. We aimed to experimentally define the CT density of cortical bone in the proximal humerus for building cortical geometry maps.MethodsWith ethical approval, we used ten fresh-frozen human proximal humeri. These were stripped of all soft tissue and high-resolution CT images were then taken. The humeral heads were then subsequently resected to allow access to the metaphyseal area. Using curettes, cancellous bone was removed down to hard cortical bone. Another set of CT images of the reamed specimen was then taken. Using CT imaging software and a CAD interface, we then compared cortical contours at different CT density thresholds to the reference inner cortical contour of our reamed specimens. Working with 3D model representations of these cortical maps, we were able to accurately make distance comparison analyses based on different CT thresholds.ResultsWe could compute a single closest value at 700 HU. No difference was found in the HU-based contours generated along the 500–900 HU pixels (p = 1.000). The contours were significantly different from those generated at 300, 400, 1,000, and 1,100 HU.ConclusionsA Hounsfield range of 500–900 HU can accurately depict cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus. Thresholding outside this range leads to statistically significant inaccuracies. Our results concur with a similar range reported in the literature for the proximal femur. Knowledge of regional variations in cortical bone thickness has direct implications for basic science studies on osteoporosis and its treatment, but is also important for the orthopedic surgeon since our decision for treatment options is often guided by local bone quality.

[1]  S. Nho,et al.  Innovations in the Management of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[2]  D. Kohn,et al.  Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[3]  C. Thomas,et al.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk , 2005, The Lancet.

[4]  J. Iannotti,et al.  The influence of intramedullary fixation on figure-of-eight wiring for surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical comparison. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  D D Robertson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Proximal Part of the Humerus: Relevance to Arthroplasty* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  P. Cripton,et al.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Proximal humeral fractures: regional differences in bone mineral density of the humeral head affect the fixation strength of cancellous screws. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  C. Neer,et al.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Klaus Engelke,et al.  Looking beyond bone mineral density , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M Besser,et al.  The utility of histological examination of tissue removed during elective joint replacement. A preliminary assessment. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Ming Ye,et al.  Precision of cortical bone reconstruction based on 3D CT scans , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[12]  E. Schneider,et al.  Factors affecting the stability of screws in human cortical osteoporotic bone: a cadaver study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  T. P. O’brien,et al.  Classification and Evaluation , 1961 .

[14]  J Lund-Larsen,et al.  Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  Thomas N. Hangartner,et al.  Accurate quantification of width and density of bone structures by computed tomography. , 2007 .

[16]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Proximal Humerus: Implications for Surgical Technique and Prosthetic Design , 1997 .

[17]  Pierre Hepp,et al.  Where Should Implants Be Anchored in the Humeral Head? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  J. Briot,et al.  Age- and gender-related distribution of bone tissue of osteoporotic humeral head using computed tomography. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  So Hyun Park,et al.  Three-dimensional osseous micro-architecture of the distal humerus: implications for internal fixation of osteoporotic fracture. , 2010, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head. , 2000, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element models based on in vivo microfocus computed tomography: Elimination of metal artefacts in a small laboratory animal model by registration with artefact-free reference images , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[23]  G. Beaupré,et al.  New QCT Analysis Approach Shows the Importance of Fall Orientation on Femoral Neck Strength , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  Atsushi Harada,et al.  Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. , 2010, Bone.

[25]  Yan Kang,et al.  A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  F. Kummer,et al.  Surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus: a laboratory evaluation of ten fixation techniques. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  J D Reuben,et al.  A Knowledge‐Based Computer‐Aided Design and Manufacturing System for Total Hip Replacement , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side. , 2008, Bone.

[29]  P S Walker,et al.  Design of intramedullary femoral stems using computer graphics. , 1985, Engineering in medicine.

[30]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[31]  C. Neer Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures , 1970 .

[32]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.