Empirical Linear Seismic Site Amplification in Central and Eastern North America

We present empirical linear site amplification models conditioned on time-averaged shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m (VS30) for central and eastern North America. The models are derived from ground motion data and site condition information from the NGA-East project and are intended for use with reference rock ground motion models. Site amplification is found to scale with VS30 for intermediate to stiff site conditions (VS30 > 300 m/s) in a weaker manner than for active tectonic regions such as the western United States. For stiff sites (>800 m/s), we find differences in site amplification for previously glaciated and nonglaciated regions, with nonglaciated sites having lower amplification. The models were developed using a combination of least-squares, mixed effects, and Bayesian techniques; the latter show that accounting for predictor uncertainty does not appreciably affect the median model but decreases model dispersion. Our VS30-scaling models are modular and additive to simulation-based models for the nonlinear components of site response. A limitation of the present models is that they do not account for site-specific resonance effects.

[1]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Effects of local geological conditions in the San Francisco Bay region on ground motions and the intensities of the 1906 earthquake , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  H. Crow,et al.  Seismic Site Response Analysis for Ottawa, Canada: A Comprehensive Study Using Measurements and Numerical Simulations , 2012 .

[3]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Reference Rock Site Condition for Central and Eastern North America , 2014 .

[4]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Non-Ergodic Site Response in Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2017 .

[5]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Exploring the Proximity of Ground-Motion Models Using High-Dimensional Visualization Techniques , 2010 .

[6]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Referenced Empirical Ground-Motion Model for Eastern North America , 2015 .

[7]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent , 1995 .

[8]  W. Silva,et al.  Site Amplification Functions for Central and Eastern North America – Part II: Modular Simulation-Based Models , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[9]  Timothy D. Ancheta,et al.  NGA-West2 Research Project , 2014 .

[10]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 2014 .

[11]  J. Stewart,et al.  Supplementing VS30 with H/V Spectral Ratios for Predicting Site Effects , 2017 .

[12]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Applicability of the Site Fundamental Frequency as a VS30 Proxy for Central and Eastern North America , 2015 .

[13]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Regionally Adjustable Generic Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation Based on Equivalent Point‐Source Simulations: Application to Central and Eastern North America , 2015 .

[14]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Modifications to Existing Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Light of New Data , 2011 .

[15]  Azad Yazdani,et al.  Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for northern Iran , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[16]  K. Campbell,et al.  Adjusting Central and Eastern North America Ground‐Motion Intensity Measures between Sites with Different Reference‐Rock Site Conditions , 2017 .

[17]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Subsurface Shear Wave Velocity Characterization Using P-Wave Seismograms in Central and Eastern North America , 2016 .

[18]  Walter J. Silva,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL HARD ROCK ATTENUATION RELATIONS FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN NORTH AMERICA, MID-CONTINENT AND GULF COAST AREAS , 2002 .

[19]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[20]  James L. Coleman,et al.  Preliminary catalog of the sedimentary basins of the United States , 2012 .

[21]  Sinan Akkar,et al.  A Nonlinear Site‐Amplification Model for the Next Pan‐European Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations , 2013 .

[22]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America , 2006 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground Motions for Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma , 2017 .

[25]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra , 2014 .

[26]  K. Campbell.  PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION USING THE HYBRID EMPIRICAL METHOD AND ITS USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GROUND-MOTION (ATTENUATION) RELATIONS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2003 .

[27]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Nonlinear Horizontal Site Amplification for Constraining the NGA-West2 GMPEs , 2014 .

[28]  Robb E.S. Moss,et al.  Reduced Sigma of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations through Uncertainty Propagation , 2011 .

[29]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[30]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Nonlinear Site Amplification Factors for Constraining the NGA Models , 2008 .

[31]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification from NGA-West2 Data and Simulations , 2014 .

[32]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Site‐Effects Model for Central and Eastern North America Based on Peak Frequency and Average Shear‐Wave Velocity , 2017 .

[33]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Tectonically Active Regions , 2003 .

[34]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using NGA Models and Updated Seismological Parameters , 2011 .

[35]  V. Graizer,et al.  Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Central and Eastern United States , 2015 .

[36]  David M. Boore,et al.  Revisions to Some Parameters Used in Stochastic‐Method Simulations of Ground Motion , 2015 .

[37]  D. Boore.  Ground‐Motion Models for Very‐Hard‐Rock Sites in Eastern North America: An Update , 2018 .

[38]  W. Silva,et al.  Site Amplification Functions for Central and Eastern North America – Part I: Simulation Data Set Development , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[39]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Proxy‐Based VS30 Estimation in Central and Eastern North America , 2017 .

[40]  David M. Boore,et al.  The effect of sampling rate and anti-aliasing filters on high-frequency response spectra , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[41]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[42]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  New Site Coefficients and Site Classification System Used in Recent Building Seismic Code Provisions , 2000 .

[43]  Evaluation of Attenuation Models for the Northeastern United States/Southeastern Canada , 2012 .

[44]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America from a Referenced Empirical Approach: Implications for Epistemic Uncertainty , 2008 .

[45]  K. Assatourians,et al.  Estimation of Moment Magnitude and Stress Parameter from ShakeMap Ground-Motion Parameters , 2015 .

[46]  Maurice S. Power,et al.  An Overview of the NGA Project , 2008 .

[47]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Model for Basin Effects on Long-Period Response Spectra in Southern California , 2008 .

[48]  Robb E.S. Moss,et al.  Reduced Uncertainty of Ground Motion Prediction Equations through Bayesian Variance Analysis , 2009 .

[49]  Christine A. Goulet,et al.  A Flatfile for the KiK-net Database Processed Using an Automated Protocol , 2016 .