Closed-loop subspace identification using the parity space

It is known that many subspace algorithms give biased estimates for closed-loop data due to the existence of feedback. In this paper we present a new subspace identification method using the parity space employed in fault detection in the past. The basic algorithm, known as subspace identification method via principal component analysis (SIMPCA), gives consistent estimation of the deterministic part and stochastic part of the system under closed loop. Column weighting for SIMPCA is introduced which shows improved efficiency/accuracy. A simulation example is given to illustrate the performance of the proposed algorithm in closed-loop identification and the effect of column weighting.

[1]  A. Willsky,et al.  Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems , 1984 .

[2]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-Loop Subspace Identification with Innovation Estimation , 2003 .

[4]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Parallel QR Implementation of Subspace Identification with Parsimonious Models , 2003 .

[5]  U. Kruger,et al.  Dynamic Principal Component Analysis Using Subspace Model Identification , 2005, ICIC.

[6]  W. Larimore.  System Identification, Reduced-Order Filtering and Modeling via Canonical Variate Analysis , 1983, 1983 American Control Conference.

[7]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovations form from input-output data , 1994, Autom..

[8]  P. Holmes,et al.  Suppression of bursting , 1997, Autom..

[9]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  A novel subspace identification approach with enforced causal models , 2005, Autom..

[10]  Alessandro Chiuso,et al.  Consistency analysis of some closed-loop subspace identification methods , 2005, Autom..

[11]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Subspace identification from closed loop data , 1996, Signal Process..

[12]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  System identification (SYSID '03) : a proceedings volume from the 13th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 27-29 August 2003 , 2004 .

[13]  Bart De Moor,et al.  N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems , 1994, Autom..

[14]  S. Ding,et al.  Closed-loop subspace identification: an orthogonal projection approach , 2004 .

[15]  Magnus Jansson,et al.  Subspace Identification and ARX Modeling , 2003 .

[16]  Mats Viberg,et al.  Subspace-based methods for the identification of linear time-invariant systems , 1995, Autom..

[17]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  Analysis of state space system identification methods based on instrumental variables and subspace fitting , 1997, Autom..

[18]  S. J. Qin,et al.  Principal component analysis for errors-in-variables subspace identification , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[19]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Subspace Algorithms for the Identification of Multivariable Dynamic Errors-in-Variables Models , 1997, Autom..

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-Loop Identification Revisited - Updated Version , 1998 .

[21]  Michel Gevers,et al.  A personal view on the development of system identification 1 , 2003 .

[22]  Tony Gustafsson.  Subspace-based system identification: weighting and pre-filtering of instruments , 2002, Autom..

[23]  Bo Wahlberg,et al.  A linear regression approach to state-space subspace system identification , 1996, Signal Process..