Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera.

The objective was to evaluate digital images of the retina from a handheld fundus camera (Nidek NM-100) for suitability in telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy. A handheld fundus camera (Nidek) and a standard fundus camera (Zeiss) were used to photograph 49 eyes from 25 consecutive patients attending our diabetic clinic. One patient had cataracts, making it impossible to get a quality image of one of the eyes (retina). The Nidek images were digitized, compressed, and stored in a Fujix DF-10M digitizer supplied with the camera. The digital images and the photographs were presented separately in a random order to three ophthalmologists. The quality of the images was ranked as good, acceptable or unacceptable for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis. The images were also evaluated for the presence of microaneurysms, blot hemorrhages, exudates, fibrous tissue, previous photocoagulation, and new vessel formation. kappa Values were computed for agreement between the photographs and digital images. Overall agreement between the photographs and digital images was poor (kappa < 0.30). On average, only 24% of the digital images were graded as being good quality and 56% as having an acceptable quality. However, 93% of the photographs were graded as good-quality images for diagnosis. The results indicate that the digital images from the handheld fundus camera may not be suitable for diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. The images shown on the liquid crystal display (LCD) screen of the camera were of good quality. However, the images produced by the digitizer (Fujix DF-10M) attached to the camera were not as good as the images shown on the LCD screen. A better digitizing system may produce better quality images from the Nidek camera.

[1]  Robert H. Eikelboom,et al.  JPEG and wavelet compression of ophthalmic images , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[2]  C J Barry,et al.  Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.

[3]  D L DeMets,et al.  The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. VI. Retinal photocoagulation. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[4]  D L DeMets,et al.  The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Intelligent health systems and third millennium medicine in Australia. , 2000, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  L. Zhou,et al.  Adhesion of human trabecular meshwork cells to extracellular matrix proteins. Roles and distribution of integrin receptors. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  I. Constable,et al.  Medical correlates and diabetic retinopathy screening. , 1980, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[8]  J. Cunha-Vaz Lowering the risk of visual impairment and blindness , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  R H Eikelboom,et al.  Tele-ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices. , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  P. Mitchell,et al.  The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: a study of 1300 diabetics from Newcastle and the Hunter Valley. , 1980, Australian journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  I. Constable,et al.  Assessing the risk of diabetic retinopathy. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.