Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: the hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing.

Currently dominant explanations of mood effects on persuasive message processing (i.e., cognitive capacity and feelings as information) predict that happy moods lead to less message scrutiny than neutral or sad moods. The hedonic contingency view (D. T. Wegener & R. E. Petty, 1994) predicts that happy moods can sometimes be associated with greater message processing activity because people in a happy mood are more attentive than neutral or sad people to the hedonic consequences of their actions. Consistent with this view, Experiment 1 finds that a happy mood can lead to greater message scrutiny than a neutral mood when the message is not mood threatening. Experiment 2 finds that a happy mood leads to greater message scrutiny than a sad mood when an uplifting message is encountered, but to less message scrutiny when a depressing message is encountered.

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  The effects of good moods on systematic processing: “Willing but not able, or able but not willing?” , 1991 .

[2]  J. Keating,et al.  Mood and persuasion: Evidence for the differential influence of positive and negative states , 1990 .

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  N. Miller,et al.  Positive mood and helping behavior: a test of six hypotheses. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[6]  David J. Klein,et al.  Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments , 1994 .

[7]  R. Wyer,et al.  Mood as Input: People Have to Interpret the Motivational Implications of Their Moods Moods and Processing , 2022 .

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[9]  F. Strack,et al.  Mood and Persuasion , 1990 .

[10]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Feeling Good, But Not Thinking Straight: The Impact of Positive Mood on Persuasion , 1991 .

[11]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[12]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications , 1991 .

[13]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Thought systems, argument quality, and persuasion. , 1991 .

[14]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  The influence of mood state on judgment and action: Effects on persuasion, categorization, social justice, person perception, and judgmental accuracy , 1992 .

[15]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Majority and minority influence : source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny , 1994 .

[16]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Multiple Roles for Affect in Persuasion , 1991 .

[17]  Donald J. Baumann,et al.  Altruism as hedonism: Helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. , 1981 .

[18]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Mood and helping: Mood as a motivator of helping and helping as a regulator of mood. , 1991 .

[19]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Effects of Responding or Not Responding to Hecklers on Audience Agreement with a Speaker , 1976 .

[20]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[21]  N. Schwarz.  Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. , 1990 .

[22]  Donald J. Baumann,et al.  Mood influences on helping: Direct effects or side effects? , 1984 .

[23]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[25]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Cognitive Mediation of Positive Affect in Persuasion , 1987 .

[26]  Norman Miller,et al.  Valid theory-testing meta-analyses further question the negative state relief model of helping. , 1990 .

[27]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[28]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[30]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[31]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Emotion and Social Judgments , 2020 .

[32]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Transgression and Altruism: A Case for Hedonism. , 1973 .

[33]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[34]  N. Miller,et al.  Explanation of the relation between negative mood and helping. , 1987 .

[35]  D. Mackie,et al.  The impact of positive affect on persuasion processes. , 1992 .