Characteristics of the design surface of damage tolerance parameters and their relation to shape optimisation

Abstract In parametric design studies, where stability is not a concern, the strength of a structure is often considered as the primary design criterion, and consequently the optimal (best) structural design is often chosen as the one that minimises the maximum stress generated. However, for structures, whereby failure is governed by fracture or fatigue, residual strength and fatigue life, as distinct from stress, need to be considered as the explicit design objectives. In this study, the design spaces for residual strength and fatigue life for different structural configurations are evaluated to demonstrate the utilities of design space exploration for damage tolerance design optimisation. This was illustrated using the problem of the optimum design of a cutout shape with boundary cracks under biaxial load. The maximum stress intensity factor and the minimum fatigue life associated with the cracks were evaluated for each cutout geometry. The design surfaces for residual strength and fatigue life establish that a design based on damage tolerance parameters poses a well-behaved optimisation problem with a well-defined minimum/maximum region. The design space was found to be flat for both residual strength and fatigue life, enabling the specification of design tolerances. The optimum values of the stress intensity factor and the fatigue life obtained from the design space agreed well with those determined using various optimisation methods. It is shown that a design space exploration can provide a systematic way to reduce the weight of a structure by adopting a ‘feasible non-optimal’ solution that meets the design criteria, rather than aiming for the ‘optimal’ (best) solution.

[1]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Multi-fidelity design of stiffened composite panel with a crack , 2002 .

[2]  Subrata Mukherjee,et al.  Shape sensitivity analysis and shape optimization in planar elasticity using the element-free Galerkin method , 2001 .

[3]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Optimisation of damage tolerant structures using a 3D biological algorithm , 2006 .

[4]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Damage tolerance based design optimisation of a fuel flow vent hole in an aircraft structure , 2009 .

[5]  Satish Chandra,et al.  Damage tolerance based shape design of a stringer cutout using evolutionary structural optimisation , 2007 .

[6]  E. Schnack,et al.  Shape optimization of dynamically loaded machine parts , 1994 .

[7]  Simon Barter,et al.  Aspects of fatigue affecting the design and maintenance of modern military aircraft , 1993 .

[8]  M. Mcdonald,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMISATION OF FATIGUE PRONE HOLES IN THE WING PIVOT FITTING OF THE RAAFS F-111 AIRCRAFT , 2002 .

[9]  Raj Das,et al.  Designing cutouts for optimum residual strength in plane structural elements , 2009 .

[10]  Rhys Jones,et al.  On the advances of design optimisation of damage tolerant structures , 2004 .

[11]  J. Rice,et al.  Elementary engineering fracture mechanics , 1974 .

[12]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape optimization of underground excavation using ESO method , 2008 .

[13]  W. Elber The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure , 1971 .

[14]  V. V. Saurin,et al.  Shape design sensitivity analysis for fracture conditions , 2000 .

[15]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[16]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[17]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Design of structures for optimal static strength using ESO , 2005 .

[18]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Development of a 3D Biological method for fatigue life based optimisation and its application to structural shape design , 2009 .

[19]  Erik Steen Kristensen,et al.  On the optimum shape of fillets in plates subjected to multiple in‐plane loading cases , 1976 .

[20]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Fatigue life enhancement of structures using shape optimisation , 2009 .

[21]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Analytical solution for embedded elliptical cracks, and finite element alternating method for elliptical surface cracks, subjected to arbitrary loadings , 1983 .

[22]  G. Dias,et al.  Shape structural optimization with an interior point nonlinear programming algorithm , 2000 .

[23]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  Structural application of a shape optimization method based on a genetic algorithm , 2001 .

[24]  M. Touratier,et al.  Optimal design for minimum weight in a cracked pressure vessel of a turboshaft , 1996 .

[25]  Rhys Jones,et al.  Designing structures for optimum fracture strength , 2004 .

[26]  Susan Pitt,et al.  Weight functions, CTOD, and related solutions for cracks at notches , 2004 .

[27]  K. Dems,et al.  Multiparameter shape optimization of elastic bars in torsion , 1980 .

[28]  J. Newman A crack opening stress equation for fatigue crack growth , 1984 .