Interpreting degenerate solutions in unfolding by use of the vector model and the compensatory distance model

In this paper, we reconsider the merits of unfolding solutions based on loss functions involving a normalization on the variance per subject. In the literature, solutions based on Stress-2 are often diagnosed to be degenerate in the majority of cases. Here, the focus lies on two frequently occurring types of degeneracies. The first type typically locates some subject points far away from a compact cluster of the other points. In the second type of solution, the object points lie on a circle. In this paper, we argue that these degenerate solutions are well fitting and informative. To reveal the information, we introduce mixtures of plots based on the ideal point model of unfolding, the vector model, and on the signed distance model. In addition to a different representation, we provide a new iterative majorization algorithm to optimize the average squared correlation between the distances in the configuration and the transformed data per individual. It is shown that this approach is equivalent to minimizing Kruskal’s Stress-2.

[1]  I. Borg,et al.  Geometric Representations of Relational Data , 1981 .

[2]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Block-relaxation Algorithms in Statistics , 1994 .

[3]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional scaling : theory and applications in the behavioral sciences , 1974 .

[4]  J. Kruskal Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the Data , 1965 .

[5]  J. Leeuw On Degenerate Nonmetric Unfolding Solutions , 2006 .

[6]  P. Groenen,et al.  Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation , 2005 .

[7]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Information Systems and Data Analysis , 1994 .

[8]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Three-way metric unfolding via alternating weighted least squares , 1985 .

[9]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  A Quasi-Metric Approach to Multidimensional Unfolding for Reducing the Occurrence of Degenerate Solutions. , 1999, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  P. Groenen,et al.  Global Optimization in Least-Squares Multidimensional Scaling by Distance Smoothing , 1999 .

[11]  William B. Michael,et al.  Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1961 .

[12]  C H COOMBS,et al.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement. , 1950, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[14]  C. Coombs A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[15]  Willem J. Heiser,et al.  Order Invariant Unfolding Analysis Under Smoothness Restrictions , 1989 .

[16]  Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al.  Optimal scaling by alternating length-constrained nonnegative least squares, with application to distance-based analysis , 2000 .

[17]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[18]  J. Leeuw Applications of Convex Analysis to Multidimensional Scaling , 2000 .

[19]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Applied multidimensional scaling : a comparison of approaches and algorithms , 1972 .

[20]  J. Barra,et al.  Recent Developments in Statistics , 1978 .