The effect of particle noise in N-body simulations of gravitational lensing

High resolution dark matter only simulations provide a realistic and fully general means to study the theoretical predictions of cosmological structure formation models for gravitational lensing. Due to the finite number of particles, the density field only becomes smooth on scales beyond a few times the local mean interparticle separation. This introduces noise on the gravitational lensing properties such as the surface mass density, the deflection angles and the magnification. At some small-scale mass limit, the noise due to the discreteness of the N-body simulation becomes comparable to the effects of physical substructures. We present analytic expressions to quantify the Poisson noise and study its scaling with the particle number of the simulation and the Lagrangian smoothing size. We use the Phoenix set of simulations, currently the largest available dark matter simulations of clusters to study the effect of limited numerical resolution and the gravitational strong lensing effects of substructure. We quantify the smallest resolved substructure, in the sense that the effect of the substructure on any strong lensing property is significant compared to the noise, and we find that the result is roughly independent of the strong lensing property. A simple scaling relates the smallest resolved substructures in a simulation with the resolution of the N-body simulation.

[1]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  Comparison of an X-ray-selected sample of massive lensing clusters with the MareNostrum Universe ΛCDM simulation , 2011, 1103.0044.

[2]  The observed concentration–mass relation for galaxy clusters , 2007, astro-ph/0703126.

[3]  Smooth Particle Lensing , 2006, astro-ph/0604360.

[4]  THE REDSHIFT DISTRIBUTION OF GIANT ARCS IN THE SLOAN GIANT ARCS SURVEY , 2010, 1010.6060.

[5]  Smooth maps from clumpy data: Covariance analysis , 2002, astro-ph/0201385.

[6]  J. Peacock,et al.  Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars , 2005, Nature.

[7]  V. Springel The Cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , 2005, astro-ph/0505010.

[8]  A. Bolton,et al.  Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging , 2009, 0910.0760.

[9]  N. Benı́tez,et al.  Strong-lensing analysis of a complete sample of 12 MACS clusters at z > 0.5: mass models and Einstein radii , 2010, 1002.0521.

[10]  S. White,et al.  The subhalo populations of ΛCDM dark haloes , 2004, astro-ph/0404589.

[11]  R. Benton Metcalf,et al.  Flux Ratios as a Probe of Dark Substructures in Quadruple-Image Gravitational Lenses , 2001, astro-ph/0111427.

[12]  J. P. McKean,et al.  Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmological distance , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Is the Number of Giant Arcs in ΛCDM Consistent with Observations , 2005, astro-ph/0503172.

[14]  L. Koopmans,et al.  Bayesian strong gravitational-lens modelling on adaptive grids: objective detection of mass substructure in Galaxies , 2008, 0805.0201.

[15]  P. Schneider,et al.  The signature of substructure on gravitational lensing in the Lambda CDM cosmological model , 2003 .

[16]  B1422+231: The influence of mass substructure on strong lensing , 2001, astro-ph/0112038.

[17]  Institute for Advanced Study,et al.  Tests for Substructure in Gravitational Lenses , 2003, astro-ph/0302036.

[18]  Gravitational Imaging of CDM Substructure , 2005, astro-ph/0501324.

[19]  P. Schneider,et al.  Evidence for substructure in lens galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9707187.

[20]  M. Oguri,et al.  SUBARU WEAK LENSING MEASUREMENTS OF FOUR STRONG LENSING CLUSTERS: ARE LENSING CLUSTERS OVERCONCENTRATED? , 2009, 0901.4372.

[21]  P. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF DARK MATTER OVER THREE DECADES IN RADIUS IN THE LENSING CLUSTER ABELL 611 , 2009, 0909.3527.

[22]  J. Monaghan Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[23]  The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters , 2003, astro-ph/0309465.

[24]  S. White,et al.  The Phoenix Project: the dark side of rich galaxy clusters , 2012, 1201.1940.

[25]  Simulations of strong gravitational lensing with substructure , 2004, astro-ph/0411587.

[26]  SMOOTHING ALGORITHMS AND HIGH-ORDER SINGULARITIES IN GRAVITATIONAL LENSING , 2006, astro-ph/0603557.

[27]  M. Postman,et al.  A PRECISE CLUSTER MASS PROFILE AVERAGED FROM THE HIGHEST-QUALITY LENSING DATA , 2011, 1105.0444.

[28]  Ucsd,et al.  Direct Detection of Cold Dark Matter Substructure , 2001, astro-ph/0111456.

[29]  M. Oguri,et al.  Combined strong and weak lensing analysis of 28 clusters from the Sloan Giant Arcs Survey , 2011, 1109.2594.

[30]  Peter Schneider,et al.  Smooth maps from clumpy data , 2001 .

[31]  T. Treu,et al.  THE DARK MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN A383: EVIDENCE FOR A SHALLOW DENSITY CUSP FROM IMPROVED LENSING, STELLAR KINEMATIC, AND X-RAY DATA , 2011, 1101.3553.

[32]  C. Keeton,et al.  Substructure in the lens HE 0435-1223 , 2011, 1109.0548.

[33]  J. Stadel,et al.  Convergence and scatter of cluster density profiles , 2004, astro-ph/0402267.

[34]  J. Stadel,et al.  Radial distribution and strong lensing statistics of satellite galaxies and substructure using high‐resolution ΛCDM hydrodynamical simulations , 2005, astro-ph/0506125.

[35]  O. Lahav,et al.  CLASH: MASS DISTRIBUTION IN AND AROUND MACS J1206.2-0847 FROM A FULL CLUSTER LENSING ANALYSIS , 2012, 1204.3630.

[36]  Smooth maps from clumpy data: Generalizations , 2003, astro-ph/0306202.

[37]  T. Treu,et al.  The Dark Matter Density Profile of the Lensing Cluster MS 2137–23: A Test of the Cold Dark Matter Paradigm , 2002, astro-ph/0207048.