Time-course of motor inhibition during hypnotic paralysis: EEG topographical and source analysis

Cognitive hypotheses of hypnotic phenomena have proposed that executive attentional systems may be either inhibited or overactivated to produce a selective alteration or disconnection of some mental operations. Recent brain imaging studies have reported changes in activity in both medial (anterior cingulate) and lateral (inferior) prefrontal areas during hypnotically induced paralysis, overlapping with areas associated with attentional control as well as inhibitory processes. To compare motor inhibition mechanisms responsible for paralysis during hypnosis and those recruited by voluntary inhibition, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain activity during a modified bimanual Go-Nogo task, which was performed either in a normal baseline condition or during unilateral paralysis caused by hypnotic suggestion or by simulation (in two groups of participants, each tested once with both hands valid and once with unilateral paralysis). This paradigm allowed us to identify patterns of neural activity specifically associated with hypnotically induced paralysis, relative to voluntary inhibition during simulation or Nogo trials. We used a topographical EEG analysis technique to investigate both the spatial organization and the temporal sequence of neural processes activated in these different conditions, and to localize the underlying anatomical generators through minimum-norm methods. We found that preparatory activations were similar in all conditions, despite left hypnotic paralysis, indicating preserved motor intentions. A large P3-like activity was generated by voluntary inhibition during voluntary inhibition (Nogo), with neural sources in medial prefrontal areas, while hypnotic paralysis was associated with a distinctive topography activity during the same time-range and specific sources in right inferior frontal cortex. These results add support to the view that hypnosis might act by enhancing executive control systems mediated by right prefrontal areas, but does not produce paralysis via direct motor inhibition processes normally used for the voluntary suppression of actions.

[1]  E. Hilgard.  THE PROBLEM OF DIVIDED CONSCIOUSNESS: A NEODISSOCIATION INTERPRETATION * , 1977, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[3]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  STANFORD HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY SCALE, FORM C , 2011 .

[4]  D. Lehmann,et al.  EEG sLORETA Functional Imaging During Hypnotic Arm Levitation and Voluntary Arm Lifting , 2012, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[5]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Core networks for visual-concrete and abstract thought content: A brain electric microstate analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Fallgatter,et al.  A robust assessment of the NoGo-anteriorisation of P300 microstates in a cued Continuous Performance Test , 2005, Brain Topography.

[7]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  The Brain under Self-Control: Modulation of Inhibitory and Monitoring Cortical Networks during Hypnotic Paralysis , 2009, Neuron.

[8]  R. Schachar,et al.  Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event‐related fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Annalena Venneri,et al.  Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[12]  T. Robbins,et al.  A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  S. Delplanque,et al.  Beyond Conventional Event-related Brain Potential (ERP): Exploring the Time-course of Visual Emotion Processing Using Topographic and Principal Component Analyses , 2008, Brain Topography.

[14]  Amir Raz,et al.  Hypnosis and neuroscience: a cross talk between clinical and cognitive research. , 2002, Archives of General Psychiatry.

[15]  Jin Fan,et al.  Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  David A. Oakley,et al.  Hypnosis and consciousness: A structural model , 1999 .

[17]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[18]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Denis Brunet,et al.  Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review , 2008, Brain Topography.

[20]  L. Deecke,et al.  Neuroimage of Voluntary Movement: Topography of the Bereitschaftspotential, a 64-Channel DC Current Source Density Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[21]  John Gruzelier,et al.  A working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: a review of evidence , 1998 .

[22]  J. Chikazoe.  Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions , 2010, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[23]  D. Spiegel,et al.  Trance and Treatment: Clinical Uses of Hypnosis , 1978 .

[24]  C. Mulert,et al.  Neural correlates (ERP/fMRI) of voluntary selection in adult ADHD patients , 2010, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[25]  Janette L. Smith,et al.  Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Differential brain activations during intentionally simulated and subjectively experienced paralysis , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychiatry.

[27]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[28]  Peter W. Halligan,et al.  Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Hypnosis Modulates Activity in Brain Structures Involved in the Regulation of Consciousness , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Shor,et al.  Norms on the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. , 1963, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[33]  J. Gruzelier.  Altered states of consciousness and hypnosis in the twenty‐first century , 2005 .

[34]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Robert J. Barry,et al.  Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  R. Barry,et al.  Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe , 2005, NeuroImage.

[40]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Fear and stop: A role for the amygdala in motor inhibition by emotional signals , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[43]  Winston D. Byblow,et al.  Stop and Go: The Neural Basis of Selective Movement Prevention , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The functional anatomy of a hysterical paralysis , 1997, Cognition.

[45]  V. Arolt,et al.  The mirror neuron system under hypnosis – Brain substrates of voluntary and involuntary motor activation in hypnotic paralysis , 2013, Cortex.

[46]  Luis Hernandez-Garcia,et al.  Challenges to attention: A continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) study of the effects of distraction on sustained attention , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[50]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M. Bushnell,et al.  Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. , 1997, Science.

[52]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[54]  Joy Hirsch,et al.  Functional Specialization within the Medial Frontal Gyrus for Perceptual Go/No-Go Decisions Based on What, When, and Where Related Information: An fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Imaging hypnotic paralysis: implications for conversion hysteria , 2000, The Lancet.

[56]  E. Woody,et al.  Dissociation in hypnosis and frontal executive function. , 1998, The American journal of clinical hypnosis.

[57]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Raz.  Anatomy of attentional networks. , 2004, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[59]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[60]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: a test of the frontal hypothesis. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[61]  B. Pfleiderer,et al.  Brain correlates of hypnotic paralysis—a resting-state fMRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[62]  H. Crawford,et al.  Brain dynamics and hypnosis: attentional and disattentional processes. , 1994, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[63]  Ryosuke Takahashi,et al.  Common inhibitory prefrontal activation during inhibition of hand and foot responses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[64]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[65]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Delusions of alien control in the normal brain , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[67]  Thomas Koenig,et al.  Electrical Neuroimaging in the time domain , 2009 .

[68]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  BrunetDenis,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG , 2011 .

[70]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Cognitive control processes and hypnosis , 2007 .

[71]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[72]  S. Swinnen,et al.  The role of anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus in the coordination of motor behaviour , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[73]  A. Turken,et al.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[75]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[76]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.