Influence of uncertainty in heat-moisture transport properties on convective drying of porous materials by numerical modelling

The influence of uncertainties in heat-moisture transport properties, due to measurement errors and material heterogeneity, on the numerical simulation results of convective drying of two capillary-saturated porous materials is investigated by a transport-property parameter analysis (TP-PA), based on the Monte Carlo method. Here, the heat-air-moisture transfer model is evaluated many times, each time using a random set of one or multiple input parameters (i.e. transport properties), by which a stochastic model output is generated. The propagation of these transport-property uncertainties to the hygrothermal behaviour of the drying system is evaluated by statistical analysis of the model simulation output. The spread on the hygrothermal response is found to be strongly material dependent and is related to the dominant mode of moisture transport in the material, i.e. liquid or vapour transport. The TP-PA results clearly indicate that uncertainties in the heat-moisture transport properties can lead to significant differences in drying behaviour predictions, where differences of the total drying time with respect to its mean value up to 200% are found for the materials considered. Therefore, numerical modelling of heat and moisture transport in porous materials should preferably include a quantification of the propagation of these uncertainties, for example by means of the proposed transport-property parameter analysis. Such analysis however additionally requires detailed (a-priori) experimental material characterisation to determine realistic uncertainty ranges.

[1]  P. Perré,et al.  Detailed study of a model of heat and mass transfer during convective drying of porous media , 1988 .

[2]  J. Carmeliet,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Hygric Properties of Porous Building Materials , 2004 .

[3]  Yoshiharu Maeda,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of the collective behavior of food particles in pneumatic drying operation , 2008 .

[4]  Brian Anderson,et al.  Uncertainty in the thermal conductivity of insulation materials , 2010 .

[5]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Analysis of convective heat and mass transfer coefficients for convective drying of a porous flat plate by conjugate modelling , 2011 .

[6]  F. Couture,et al.  Simulation of Convective Drying of a Porous Medium with Boundary Conditions Provided by CFD , 2006 .

[7]  Kevin Cronin,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of a vegetable tray dryer , 1998 .

[8]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  CONSERVATIVE MODELLING OF THE MOISTURE AND HEAT TRANSFER IN BUILDING COMPONENTS UNDER ATMOSPHERIC EXCITATION , 2007 .

[9]  Marc Prat,et al.  Percolation model of drying under isothermal conditions in porous media , 1993 .

[10]  N. Lamaddalena,et al.  Monte Carlo analysis of field water flow comparing uni- and bimodal effective hydraulic parameters for structured soil. , 2009, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[11]  Prabal Talukdar,et al.  Reliability of material data measurements for hygroscopic buffering , 2010 .

[12]  Andreas G. Boudouvis,et al.  A 2-D pore-network model of the drying of single-component liquids in porous media , 2001 .

[13]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Assessment Method of Numerical Prediction Models for Combined Heat, Air and Moisture Transfer in Building Components: Benchmarks for One-dimensional Cases , 2004 .

[14]  Filip Descamps,et al.  A Multiscale Network Model for Simulating Moisture Transfer Properties of Porous Media , 1999 .

[15]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Determination of the Liquid Water Diffusivity from Transient Moisture Transfer Experiments , 2004 .

[16]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Viscous stabilization of drying front: Three-dimensional pore network simulations , 2008 .