The Inactivation Principle: Mathematical Solutions Minimizing the Absolute Work and Biological Implications for the Planning of Arm Movements

An important question in the literature focusing on motor control is to determine which laws drive biological limb movements. This question has prompted numerous investigations analyzing arm movements in both humans and monkeys. Many theories assume that among all possible movements the one actually performed satisfies an optimality criterion. In the framework of optimal control theory, a first approach is to choose a cost function and test whether the proposed model fits with experimental data. A second approach (generally considered as the more difficult) is to infer the cost function from behavioral data. The cost proposed here includes a term called the absolute work of forces, reflecting the mechanical energy expenditure. Contrary to most investigations studying optimality principles of arm movements, this model has the particularity of using a cost function that is not smooth. First, a mathematical theory related to both direct and inverse optimal control approaches is presented. The first theoretical result is the Inactivation Principle, according to which minimizing a term similar to the absolute work implies simultaneous inactivation of agonistic and antagonistic muscles acting on a single joint, near the time of peak velocity. The second theoretical result is that, conversely, the presence of non-smoothness in the cost function is a necessary condition for the existence of such inactivation. Second, during an experimental study, participants were asked to perform fast vertical arm movements with one, two, and three degrees of freedom. Observed trajectories, velocity profiles, and final postures were accurately simulated by the model. In accordance, electromyographic signals showed brief simultaneous inactivation of opposing muscles during movements. Thus, assuming that human movements are optimal with respect to a certain integral cost, the minimization of an absolute-work-like cost is supported by experimental observations. Such types of optimality criteria may be applied to a large range of biological movements.

[1]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  W. L. Nelson Physical principles for economies of skilled movements , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  T Vilis,et al.  Braking of fast and accurate elbow flexions in the monkey. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Y Uno,et al.  Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Vladimir M. Zakalyukin,et al.  On the One-Step-Bracket-Generating Motion Planning Problem , 2005 .

[12]  Joseph McIntyre,et al.  Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  Marjan A Admiraal,et al.  Modeling kinematics and dynamics of human arm movements. , 2004, Motor control.

[14]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of Fast-Reaching Movements by Muscle Synergy Combinations , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Suzuki,et al.  Minimum Muscle-Tension Change Trajectories Predicted by Using a 17-Muscle Model of the Monkey's Arm. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. McIntyre,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity , 2005, Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. Flanders,et al.  Force path curvature and conserved features of muscle activation , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Amir Karniel,et al.  Minimum Acceleration Criterion with Constraints Implies Bang-Bang Control as an Underlying Principle for Optimal Trajectories of Arm Reaching Movements , 2008, Neural Computation.

[22]  J. Nishii An analytical estimation of the energy cost for legged locomotion. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  When Is a Linear Control System Optimal , 1964 .

[24]  Ian David Loram,et al.  Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  How humans control arm movements , 2008 .

[26]  F. Clarke Optimization And Nonsmooth Analysis , 1983 .

[27]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[28]  J. Robbin,et al.  Transversal mappings and flows , 2008 .

[29]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Optimal Control Theory , 2006 .

[31]  H. Hermes,et al.  Foundations of optimal control theory , 1968 .

[32]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Golubitsky,et al.  Stable mappings and their singularities , 1973 .

[34]  C. Erkelens,et al.  A comparison of curvatures of left and right hand movements in a simple pointing task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  Bernard Bonnard Invariants in the feedback classification of nonlinear systems , 1989 .

[37]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[38]  S. Scott,et al.  Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[40]  Armin Biess,et al.  A Computational Model for Redundant Human Three-Dimensional Pointing Movements: Integration of Independent Spatial and Temporal Motor Plans Simplifies Movement Dynamics , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Gauthier,et al.  Deterministic Observation Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[42]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Andrew Y. Ng,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of a novel formulation of ivermectin after administration to goats , 2000, ICML.

[44]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  Konrad Paul Körding,et al.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[47]  M. Flanders,et al.  Basic features of phasic activation for reaching in vertical planes , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  R. McN. Alexander,et al.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[49]  S. Gielen,et al.  Posture-based or trajectory-based movement planning: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  M. Flanders,et al.  Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Jiping He,et al.  Determining natural arm configuration along a reaching trajectory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  K. Brown,et al.  Graduate Texts in Mathematics , 1982 .

[53]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[54]  C. Papaxanthis,et al.  Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field , 2007, Neuroscience.

[55]  Emmanuel Guigon,et al.  Computational Motor Control : Redundancy and Invariance , 2007 .

[56]  M. Flanders,et al.  Two components of muscle activation: scaling with the speed of arm movement. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  M. L. Chambers The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes , 1965 .

[58]  Alexander Rm,et al.  A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. , 1997 .

[59]  M. Flanders,et al.  Muscle activation patterns for reaching: the representation of distance and time. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  L. S. Pontryagin,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes , 1962 .

[61]  Sascha E. Engelbrecht,et al.  Minimum Principles in Motor Control. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[62]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.