Transition of optical regime in miniaturized optical systems: light interactions beyond the refraction limit

We investigate the transition of optical regimes of miniaturized optical systems using two canonical examples, where the refraction of light limits the system performance. A ball-lens and a solid immersion lens (SIL) are considered, whose refractive responses can be intuitively described by ray optics when the system size is relatively large. For miniaturized systems, the optical response differs from that of conventional large systems. Since such new responses occur when the refractive response of light start to disappear, this boundary is called the refraction limit. Our intension is to bring insights into new phenomena beyond such a boundary.. First, the refraction limit of the ball-lens is identified with three different criteria: the focal length, the spot size, and the amount of depolarization. The light confinement effect of nanoscale SILs, which have an intentionally deformed shape, demonstrates the diminishing effect of the refractive response of light. Likewise, beyond the refraction limit of the miniaturized systems, the signature of refractive degradations vanishes, and the shape errors of elements become negligible.

[1]  Kathleen S. Youngworth,et al.  Focusing of high numerical aperture cylindrical-vector beams. , 2000, Optics express.

[2]  E. Abbe,et al.  VII.—On the Estimation of Aperture in the Microscope. , 1881 .

[3]  Myun-Sik Kim,et al.  Engineering photonic nanojets. , 2011, Optics express.

[4]  Tetsuji Yano,et al.  Fabrication of high-refractive-index glass micron-sized solid immersion lenses by a surface-tension mold technique , 2008 .

[5]  Philip Kim,et al.  Near-field focusing and magnification through self-assembled nanoscale spherical lenses , 2009, Nature.

[6]  E. Abbe XXXVII.—On New Methods for Improving Spherical Correction, applied to the Construction of Wide-angled Object-glasses , 1879 .

[7]  A. Taflove,et al.  Photonic nanojets , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, 2004..

[8]  Myun-Sik Kim,et al.  Subwavelength-size solid immersion lens. , 2011, Optics letters.

[9]  Myun-Sik Kim,et al.  Light confinement effect of nonspherical nanoscale solid immersion lenses , 2013 .

[10]  Myun-Sik Kim,et al.  Small-size microlens characterization by multiwavelength high-resolution interference microscopy. , 2010, Optics express.

[11]  Gregg T. Borek,et al.  Investigation of Micro Solid Immersion Lens Mounting Systems , 2007 .

[12]  Kenneth E. Goodson,et al.  Microfabricated silicon solid immersion lens , 2001 .

[13]  G. Kino,et al.  Solid immersion microscope , 1990 .

[14]  T. Pearcey,et al.  XXXI. The structure of an electromagnetic field in the neighbourhood of a cusp of a caustic , 1946 .

[15]  Daniel R. Mason,et al.  Enhanced resolution beyond the Abbe diffraction limit with wavelength-scale solid immersion lenses. , 2010, Optics letters.

[16]  Zengbo Wang,et al.  Optical virtual imaging at 50 nm lateral resolution with a white-light nanoscope. , 2011, Nature communications.

[17]  Michael V Berry,et al.  Rays, wavefronts and phase: a picture book of cusps , 1992 .

[18]  F. Träger Springer Handbook of Lasers and Optics , 2007 .

[19]  Robert Brunner,et al.  Diffraction-based solid immersion lens. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.