Beyond killing one to save five: Sensitivity to ratio and probability in moral judgment

[1]  A. Smajdor,et al.  Consequentialism , 2021, Oxford Handbook of Medical Ethics and Law.

[2]  A. Mata,et al.  Real people or mere numbers? The influence of kill-save ratios and identifiability on moral judgements (¿Personas reales o meros números? La influencia de la proporción vidas sacrificadas/vidas salvadas y la identificabilidad en los juicios morales) , 2021, International Journal of Social Psychology.

[3]  C. Mckenzie,et al.  Sensitivity to shifts in probability of harm and benefit in moral dilemmas , 2021, Cognition.

[4]  P. Foot.  The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect , 2020, The Doctrine of Double Effect.

[5]  P. Punjabi.  The morality of mortality , 2019, Perfusion.

[6]  A. Diederich,et al.  Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type , 2018, Judgment and Decision Making.

[7]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers , 2018, Cognition.

[8]  Julian De Freitas,et al.  Moral Goodness Is the Essence of Personal Identity , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Tony Reeves.  Imposing Risk: A Normative Framework , 2018 .

[10]  N. Christenfeld,et al.  Intuitive Probabilities and the Limitation of Moral Imagination. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[11]  S. Johnson,et al.  Optimality Bias in Moral Judgment , 2017, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[12]  Y. Shou,et al.  Decisions in moral dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities , 2017, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  Julian De Freitas,et al.  Origins of the Belief in Good True Selves , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Pinker,et al.  Kill or Die: Moral Judgment Alters Linguistic Coding of Causality , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  D. Cohen,et al.  A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Savulescu,et al.  ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good , 2015, Cognition.

[18]  Anita Körner,et al.  Concrete and abstract ways to deontology: Cognitive capacity moderates construal level effects on moral judgments☆ , 2014 .

[19]  D. Nelkin,et al.  Three Cheers for Double Effect , 2014 .

[20]  Albert Costa,et al.  Your Morals Depend on Language , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Jean‐François Bonnefon,et al.  Efficient Kill–Save Ratios Ease Up the Cognitive Demands on Counterintuitive Moral Utilitarianism , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  M. Crockett.  Models of morality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  F. Cushman.  Action, Outcome, and Value , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Discrepancies between Judgment and Choice of Action in Moral Dilemmas , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[26]  David D. Oberhelman.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[27]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications , 2012, Judgment and Decision Making.

[28]  Elinor Amit,et al.  You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means , 2012, Psychological science.

[29]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[30]  J. Lammers.  Abstraction increases hypocrisy , 2012 .

[31]  Marcus Arvan.  Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study , 2011, Neuroethics.

[32]  Fiery Cushman,et al.  Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  John Mikhail.  Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment , 2011 .

[34]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Moral Judgments Recruit Domain-General Valuation Mechanisms to Integrate Representations of Probability and Magnitude , 2010, Neuron.

[35]  W. FitzPatrick.  Thomson's turnabout on the trolley , 2009 .

[36]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment , 2009, Cognition.

[37]  Fredrik Björklund,et al.  moraL concerns are greater For temporaLLy Distant eVents anD are moDerateD by VaLUe strength , 2009 .

[38]  J. Thomson.  Turning the Trolley , 2008 .

[39]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[42]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications , 2007 .

[43]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[44]  Shaun Nichols,et al.  Moral dilemmas and moral rules , 2006, Cognition.

[45]  Jana Schaich Borg,et al.  Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An fMRI Investigation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[47]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance , 2003 .

[48]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[50]  L. Nystrom,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[51]  M. Moore.  Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law , 1998 .

[52]  S. Rickless.  The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing , 1997 .

[53]  Samantha J. Brennan.  Thresholds for Rights , 1995 .

[54]  Robert B. Hallborg,et al.  The Realm of Rights , 1995 .

[55]  S. Lock.  Right and wrong , 1990, Nature.

[56]  Warren S. Quinn.  Morality and Action: Actions, intentions, and consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing , 1989 .

[57]  T. Nagel.  War and Massacre , 1986, War and Moral Responsibility.

[58]  J. Thomson.  The Trolley Problem , 1985 .

[59]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[60]  G. Smith.  ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA , 1976 .

[61]  J. Thomson.  Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. , 1976, The Monist.

[62]  Gerard J Hughes,et al.  Killing and letting die. , 1975, The Month.

[63]  R. Stammler,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[64]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Moral Hindsight , 2017, Experimental psychology.

[65]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[66]  Dieter Schönecker,et al.  I M M A N U E L K A N T Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals , 2011 .

[67]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view , 2009 .

[68]  Adam B. Moore,et al.  Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment , 2009 .

[69]  Shelly Kagan,et al.  The limits of morality , 1989 .

[70]  Warren S. Quinn.  Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. , 1989, Philosophy & public affairs.