Measurement Accuracy of Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate during Graded Exercise and Sustained Exercise in the Heat Using the Zephyr BioHarnessTM

The Zephyr BioHarness was tested to determine the accuracy of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measurements during 2 exercise protocols in conjunction with either a laboratory metabolic cart (Vmax) or a previously validated portable metabolic system (K4b2). In one protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BioHarness and Vmax during a graded exercise up to V˙O2max (n=12). In another protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BH and K4b2 during sustained exercise (30% and 50% V˙O2max for 20 min each) in a hot environment (30 °C, 50% relative humidity) (n=6). During the graded exercise, HR but not RR, obtained from the BioHarness was higher compared to the Vmax at baseline and 30% V˙O2max (p<0.05), but showed no significant difference at other stages with high correlation coefficients for both HR (r=0.87-0.96) and RR (r=0.90-0.99 above 30% V˙O2max). During the exercise in the heat, there were no significant differences between the BioHarness and K4b2 system. Correlation coefficients between the methods were low for HR but moderately to highly correlated (0.49-0.99) for RR. In conclusion, the BioHarness is comparable to Vmax and K4b2 over a wide range of V˙O2 during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat.

[1]  M. Gorelick,et al.  Accuracy of an infrared LED device to measure heart rate and energy expenditure during rest and exercise , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  Andrew E. Kilding,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Zephyr™ BioHarness™ to Measure Respiratory Responses to Exercise , 2011 .

[3]  Bruce J. West,et al.  The independently fractal nature of respiration and heart rate during exercise under normobaric and hyperbaric conditions , 2005, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[4]  H. Kinoshita,et al.  The heart rate increase at the onset of high-work intensity exercise is accelerated by central blood volume loading , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[5]  C. Larsson,et al.  Evaluation of a New Fibre-Optical Monitor for Respiratory Rate Monitoring , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[6]  G Atkinson,et al.  Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research , 2011, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  Paris B Lovett,et al.  The vexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triage. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  D. Dodds,et al.  The PEP transducer: a new way of measuring respiratory rate in the non-intubated patient. , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[9]  C. Zwillich,et al.  The control of breathing in clinical practice. , 2000, Chest.

[10]  A. Sheel,et al.  Measurement of exercise ventilation by a portable respiratory inductive plethysmograph , 2006, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[11]  B. Dolezal,et al.  Validity of Seven Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors , 2002 .

[12]  R. Saatchi,et al.  Respiration rate monitoring methods: A review , 2011, Pediatric pulmonology.

[13]  A. Coca,et al.  Physiological Monitoring in Firefighter Ensembles: Wearable Plethysmographic Sensor Vest versus Standard Equipment , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 Portable Metabolic System , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.