Robust visual fiducials for skin-to-skin relative ship pose estimation

This paper reports on an optical visual fiducial system developed for relative-pose estimation of two ships at sea. Visual fiducials are ubiquitous in the robotics literature, however none are specifically designed for use in outdoor lighting conditions. Blooming of the CCD causes a significant bias in the estimated pose of square tags that use the outer corners as point correspondences. In this paper, we augment existing state-of-the-art visual fiducials with a border of circles that enables high accuracy, robust pose estimation. We also present a methodology for characterizing tag measurement uncertainty on a per measurement basis. We integrate these methods into a relative ship motion estimation system and support our results using outdoor imagery and field data collected aboard the USNS John Glenn and USNS Bob Hope during skin-to-skin operations.

[1]  V. Lepetit,et al.  EPnP: An Accurate O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[2]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Alastair R. Beresford,et al.  Cantag: an open source software toolkit for designing and deploying marker-based vision systems , 2006, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM'06).

[4]  Randall Smith,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Spatial Relationships in Robotics , 1987, Autonomous Robot Vehicles.

[5]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[7]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents) , 2005 .

[8]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[9]  Andrea Torsello,et al.  Pi-Tag: a fast image-space marker design based on projective invariants , 2013, Machine Vision and Applications.

[10]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Circular markers for camera pose estimation , 2011, WIAMIS 2011.

[11]  Robert M. Haralick.  Propagating covariance in computer vision , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  Qian Chen,et al.  Camera Calibration with Two Arbitrary Coplanar Circles , 2004, ECCV.

[14]  Paul Ozog,et al.  On the importance of modeling camera calibration uncertainty in visual SLAM , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Kari Pulli,et al.  Realtime Computer Vision with OpenCV , 2012, ACM Queue.

[16]  Paul F. Whelan,et al.  Which pattern? Biasing aspects of planar calibration patterns and detection methods , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag 2: Efficient and robust fiducial detection , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[18]  Ryan M. Eustice,et al.  Large-area visually augmented navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles , 2005 .

[19]  Mark Fiala,et al.  ARTag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[20]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system , 1999, Proceedings 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR'99).

[21]  Simon J. Julier,et al.  The scaled unscented transformation , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[22]  Andrea Torsello,et al.  RUNE-Tag: A high accuracy fiducial marker with strong occlusion resilience , 2011, CVPR 2011.