Nurture or nature? The growth paradox of research-based spin-offs

This study explores the effect of institutional origin (‘nurture’) and economic context (‘nature’) on the financial resource endowment and subsequent early employment growth of research-based spin-offs (RBSOs). The nurture dimensions capture the relationship between the parent research institution and the RBSO during the start-up phase: the type of incubation model, the formal vs informal transfer of technology and the extent of inventors’ involvement with the firm. The nature dimensions include the technology domain in which the RBSO operates and the complexity of the sales process. Using a unique dataset of RBSOs in Flanders (N=85, representing 75% of the population), our analysis shows that the financial resource endowment, is predicted by both institutional origin (nurture) dimensions and economic context ones (nature). Initial capital in turn, is a key driver of subsequent employment growth of RBSOs.

[1]  Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[4]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer , 2005 .

[5]  Scott Shane,et al.  Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States , 2004 .

[6]  S. Trevis Certo,et al.  Influencing Initial Public Offering Investors with Prestige: Signaling with Board Structures , 2003 .

[7]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Exploring the Networking Characteristics of New Venture Founding Teams: A Stdy of Italian Academic Spin-off , 2003 .

[8]  V. Mangematin,et al.  Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: the case of biotechnology in France , 2003 .

[9]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[10]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance , 1997 .

[11]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising , 2007 .

[12]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[13]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure , 1997 .

[15]  Choonwoo Lee,et al.  Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance. A study on technology-based ventures , 2001 .

[16]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms , 2005 .

[17]  Anna Nosella,et al.  University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: an analysis of Italian academic spin-offs , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[18]  Stephen E. Heiman,et al.  The new strategic selling : the unique sales system proven successful by the world's best companies : revised and updated for the 21st cencury , 1998 .

[19]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[20]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[21]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures , 2004 .

[22]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[23]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[24]  Mattias Johansson.  Corporate Spin-offs and the Significance of Founders’ Informal Relations , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[25]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[26]  S. Shane.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[29]  Malte Brettel,et al.  Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures , 2010 .

[30]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[31]  James N. Baron,et al.  Building the Iron Cage: Determinants of Managerial Intensity in the Early Years of Organizations , 1999 .

[32]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[33]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  MINDING THE COMPETITION: FROM MAPPING TO MASTERY , 1994 .

[34]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[35]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs In High Technology , 1991 .

[36]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Institutional Forces , 2006 .

[37]  Daniel E. Massing,et al.  AUTM Licensing Survey , 1996 .

[38]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[39]  K. Debackere,et al.  Policies to Stimulate Regional Innovation Capabilities Via University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis and an Assessment , 2003 .

[40]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[41]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research , 2008 .

[42]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups , 2004 .

[43]  S. Iammarino,et al.  EU Regions and Multinational Corporations: Change, Stability and Strengthening of Technological Comparative Advantages , 2001 .

[44]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-Based Entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden , 2007 .

[45]  Antonio Dávila,et al.  Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms , 2003 .

[46]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups , 2005 .

[47]  M. Bray,et al.  University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions , 2000 .

[48]  Sue Birley,et al.  Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts , 2003 .