The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams.

Online quizzes were introduced into an undergraduate Exercise Physiology course to encourage students to read ahead and think critically about the course material before coming to class. The purpose of the study was to determine if the use of the online quizzes was associated with improvements in summative exam scores and if the online quizzes were valid predictors of summative exam performance. A retrospective analysis was performed on the course scores from three different groups of Exercise Physiology students. Students in group 1 completed the original version of the course, those in group 2 completed an updated version of the course that included more rigorous exam questions, and those in group 3 completed the same updated version of the course but with the addition of 10 required online quizzes. Results showed that the overall mean summative exam score from group 3 was significantly higher than that from group 2 (81.79 +/- 8.26 and 78.72 +/- 9.61, respectively). A significant positive correlation (r = 0.50) was also found between individual mean online quiz scores and individual mean exam scores for those students in group 3. It was concluded that the formative online quizzes did enhance summative exam performance and that the online quizzes were valid predictors of exam performance.

[1]  B. Fraser.  Identifying the Salient Facets of a Model of Student Learning: A Synthesis of Meta Analyses. , 1987 .

[2]  Roy B. Clariana,et al.  A Review of Multiple-Try Feedback in Traditional and Computer-Based Instruction. , 1993 .

[3]  J. McPherson,et al.  Formative assessment: how am I doing? , 1995, The Lancet.

[4]  P. Black,et al.  Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? , 1996 .

[5]  Joanna Bull,et al.  The Mass Implementation and Evaluation of Computer‐based Assessments , 1998 .

[6]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[7]  David Steele,et al.  Learning style influences student examination performance. , 1998, American Journal of Surgery.

[8]  Fowell,et al.  Evaluating assessment: the missing link? , 1999, Medical education.

[9]  J. Seale,et al.  The influence of assessments on students’ motivation to learn in a therapy degree course , 2000, Medical education.

[10]  Thomas Buchanan,et al.  The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  The Impact of "No Opinion" Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice? , 2001 .

[12]  Thomas Brothen,et al.  Effective Student Use of Computerized Quizzes , 2001 .

[13]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. , 2001 .

[14]  B. Heffler.  Individual Learning Style and the Learning Style Inventory , 2001 .

[15]  G. Vita.  Learning Styles, Culture and Inclusive Instruction in the Multicultural Classroom: A Business and Management Perspective , 2001 .

[16]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[17]  Mary Peat,et al.  Has student learning been improved by the use of online and offline formative assessment opportunities , 2003 .

[18]  K. A. Haberyan,et al.  Do Weekly Quizzes Improve Student Performance on General Biology Exams? , 2003 .

[19]  D. Henly,et al.  Use of Web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit. , 2003, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[20]  B. Olson,et al.  Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses. , 2004, Journal of dental education.

[21]  T. Brothen,et al.  The Value of Time Limits on Internet Quizzes , 2004 .

[22]  Ian Dennis,et al.  Approaches to learning and studying in medical students: validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance , 2004, Medical education.

[23]  Mary Peat,et al.  Revisiting the impact of formative assessment opportunities on student learning , 2005 .

[24]  C. Thompson.  Unintended Lessons: Plagiarism and the University. , 2006 .

[25]  Laura M. Padilla-Walker,et al.  The Impact of Daily Extra Credit Quizzes on Exam Performance , 2006 .

[26]  Fiona Duggan,et al.  Plagiarism: prevention, practice and policy , 2006 .

[27]  J. Kibble,et al.  Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.

[28]  Mandeep K Brar,et al.  Effect of quantitative feedback on student performance on the National Board Medical Examination in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  E. Palmer,et al.  Limitations of student-driven formative assessment in a clinical clerkship. A randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMC medical education.

[30]  Arianne M. Dantas,et al.  A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. , 2008, Advances in physiology education.

[31]  Xavier Caseras,et al.  Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.