Functional MRI as a tool to assess vision in dogs: the optimal anesthetic.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a recent advance in neuroimaging that provides a picture of brain activity with excellent spatial resolution. Current methods used to evaluate canine vision are poorly standardized and vulnerable to bias. Functional MRI may represent a valuable method of testing vision in dogs if the impacts of anesthesia on fMRI are understood. Six dogs were scanned during visual stimulation, each under three different anesthetic protocols (isoflurane, propofol, fentanyl/midazolam) to address the questions: (1) Can visually evoked fMR signals be reliably recorded in anesthetized dogs? and (2) Which anesthetic agent permits the least suppression of visually induced fMR signal in dogs? This study confirms that visual stimuli reliably elicit neural activity and fMR signal change in anesthetized dogs. No significant differences in images acquired under the three anesthetics were found, and there was no significant relationship between anesthetic dose and brain activity, within the range of doses used in this study. Images obtained during isoflurane anesthesia were more consistent between dogs than those obtained with the other two agents. This reduced variation may reflect the fact that inhalant anesthesia is more easily controlled than intravenous anesthesia under conditions associated with high field fMRI.

[1]  The Cerebral Metabolic Effects of Isoflurane at and above Concentrations that Suppress Cortical Electrical Activity , 1983, Anesthesiology.

[2]  Heinrich Reichert Introduction to neurobiology , 1992 .

[3]  J. Lunn,et al.  Consciousness, Awareness, and Pain in General Anesthesia , 1987 .

[4]  J. Odom,et al.  Canine visual acuity: retinal and cortical field potentials evoked by pattern stimulation. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  High-resolution mapping of iso-orientation columns by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Raichle,et al.  Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  C. Ferris,et al.  Comparison of evoked cortical activity in conscious and propofol‐anesthetized rats using functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R. Jackson,et al.  Visual evoked potentials in the clinically normal dog. , 1990, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

[9]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.

[10]  C. D. Coryell,et al.  The Magnetic Properties and Structure of Hemoglobin, Oxyhemoglobin and Carbonmonoxyhemoglobin , 1936, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Ueki,et al.  Effect of alpha‐chloralose, halothane, pentobarbital and nitrous oxide anesthesia on metabolic coupling in somatosensory cortex of rat , 1992, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  R. Woods,et al.  Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging , 1996, Nature.

[13]  J. A. Sanders,et al.  CHAPTER 7 – Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1995 .

[14]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Sims Mh,et al.  Waveform analysis and reproducibility of visual-evoked potentials in dogs. , 1989 .

[17]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: In vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  B. Rosen,et al.  Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: Contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Use of innate behaviors to evaluate sensory function in the dog. , 1991, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[21]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[24]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  An in vivo model for functional MRI in cat visual cortex , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J. Strupp Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package , 1996, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. D. Lahunta Veterinary neuroanatomy and clinical neurology. , 1977 .