Sharing human samples and patient data: Opening Pandora’s box

Abstract Background Sharing of clinical research data is a much-debated topic. Actions are being taken at various levels ranging from industry cooperative data sharing models to high-level policy interventions. Similar approaches for sharing biological samples are lacking. Aims and methods An in-depth understanding of the motives for sharing, and the still too often lack thereof, is acquired through semi-structured interviews with 32 experts. Results Moral, societal, scientific, and economic reasons favoring sharing are driving a change in the behavior of both commercial and non-commercial organizations. Whereas concerns of losing control, the impact on incentives to invest, privacy and data protection considerations, pragmatic impediments, and samples' finite nature greatly impede exploiting the scientific potential of these valuable patient resources. Conclusion Addressing these concerns by mitigating the risks can provide incentives for sharing, and thereby leverage scientific research. Finally, a collective vision is necessary by all stakeholders that sharing will stimulate science and innovation in the medium and long term, and thereby outweigh potential short term disadvantages.

[1]  Mark Barnes,et al.  Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Murat Sariyar,et al.  Sharing and Reuse of Sensitive Data and Samples: Supporting Researchers in Identifying Ethical and Legal Requirements , 2015, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[3]  Atul J. Butte,et al.  Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough? , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[4]  Robert W. Corty,et al.  The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data. , 2015, The oncologist.

[5]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Supporting open access to clinical trial data for researchers: The Duke Clinical Research Institute-Bristol-Myers Squibb Supporting Open Access to Researchers Initiative. , 2016, American heart journal.

[6]  John Fletcher,et al.  Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2016, The National medical journal of India.

[7]  Guido Rasi,et al.  Transparency and the European Medicines Agency--sharing of clinical trial data. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Frank Pétavy,et al.  Access to patient-level trial data--a boon to drug developers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Kelly Edwards,et al.  From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  F. Godlee,et al.  The Tamiflu trials , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Peter Doshi,et al.  Neuraminidase inhibitors—the story behind the Cochrane review , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Michael Morrison,et al.  Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[13]  Michael J. Pencina,et al.  Use of Open Access Platforms for Clinical Trial Data. , 2016, JAMA.

[14]  I. Huys,et al.  Qualitative study on custodianship of human biological material and data stored in biobanks , 2016, BMC Medical Ethics.

[15]  J. Drazen Data Sharing and the Journal. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  European perspective for effective cancer drug development , 2014, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Jackson T. Wright,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Sigrid Sterckx,et al.  Access to human tissues for research and product development , 2015, EMBO reports.

[19]  VerlindenMichiel,et al.  Access to biobanks: harmonization across biobank initiatives. , 2014 .

[20]  Simon Woods,et al.  International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[21]  P. Ubel,et al.  Transplantation traffic--geography as destiny for transplant candidates. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  C. D. Angelis An analysis of trade secrets: directive 943/2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure , 2018 .

[23]  Rebecca Smith-Bindman,et al.  Is computed tomography safe? , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[25]  M. Sheehan Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent? , 2011, Public health ethics.