"It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.
暂无分享,去创建一个
John N Lavis | John Eyles | Mita Giacomini | Julia Abelson | J. Lavis | J. Eyles | J. Abelson | M. Giacomini | F. Gauvin | Francois-Pierre Gauvin
[1] G. Rowe,et al. Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .
[2] V. Entwistle,et al. Developing Information Materials to Present the Findings of Technology Assessments to Consumers: The Experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[3] Maria Olejaz,et al. Denmark health system review. , 2012, Health systems in transition.
[4] C. Charles,et al. Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. , 1993, Journal of health politics, policy and law.
[5] J. Vang. The Consensus Development Conference and the European Experience , 1986, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[6] H. Have. Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment. , 2004 .
[7] R. Battista,et al. Health technology assessment in Canada , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[8] E. Hansen. Technology Assessment in a User Perspective-Experiences with Drug Technology , 1992, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[9] J. Pivik,et al. A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. , 2004, Health policy.
[10] D. Banta. The development of health technology assessment. , 2003, Health policy.
[11] J. Morse. Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis , 1995, ANS. Advances in nursing science.
[12] Glyn Davis,et al. Mapping Public Participation in Policy Choices , 2002 .
[13] Risto P Roine,et al. Health technology assessment in Finland , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[14] J. Dixon,et al. Public involvement in health care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[15] B. N. Ong. The Lay Perspective in Health Technology Assessment , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[16] Jenny Donovan,et al. 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. , 2002, Social science & medicine.
[17] M. Patton. Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .
[18] H. Bastian,et al. Speaking Up for Ourselves: The Evolution of Consumer Advocacy in Health Care , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[19] D. Menon,et al. The Development of a Health Technology Assessment Program: The Case of Alberta , 1995, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[20] M. Wetherell,et al. Opening the box: evaluating the Citizens Council of NICE: report prepared for the National Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology, NHS Research and Development Programme , 2005 .
[21] Bryn Williams-Jones,et al. Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[22] J. Abelson,et al. Engaging Citizens: One Route to Health Care Accountability , 2004 .
[23] D. Guston. Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .
[24] D. McDaid. Co-ordinating health technology assessment in Canada: a European perspective. , 2003, Health policy.
[25] L. Bonneux,et al. Balancing evidence and public opinion in health technology assessments: The case of leukoreduction , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[26] Simon Joss,et al. Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe , 1995 .
[27] D. Hailey,et al. Consumer Involvement in Health Technology Assessment , 2005 .
[28] A. Coulter. Perspectives on health technology assessment: response from the patient's perspective , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[29] Janice M Morse,et al. Constructing Qualitatively Derived Theory: Concept Construction and Concept Typologies , 2004, Qualitative health research.
[30] J. Tritter,et al. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. , 2006, Health policy.
[31] A. Hvenegaard,et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN DENMARK , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[32] Michael Drummond,et al. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[33] G. Sartori. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics , 1970, American Political Science Review.
[34] J. Sisk. Introduction to Measuring Health Care Effectiveness , 1990, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[35] M. Calnan,et al. The Patient's Perspective , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[36] Mita Giacomini,et al. Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. , 2007, Health policy.
[37] David Hailey,et al. Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[38] Joanna Goven. Assessing genetic testing: who are the "lay experts"? , 2008, Health policy.
[39] John F P Bridges,et al. Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[40] P. Lehoux. The problem of health technology : policy implications for modern health care systems , 2006 .
[41] A. Braunack-Mayer. Ethics and health technology assessment: Handmaiden and/or critic? , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[42] S. Oliver,et al. Involving consumers in a needs‐led research programme: a pilot project , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[43] E. Nolte,et al. Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis , 2006, Health Economics, Policy and Law.
[45] J. Newman,et al. Discursive Arenas: Deliberation and the Constitution of Identity in Public Participation at a Local Level , 2006 .
[46] S. Oliver,et al. Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[47] P. Andreasen. Consensus Conferences in Different Countries , 1988, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[48] P. Cleary. Satisfaction May Not Suffice!: A Commentary on ‘a Patient's Perspective’ , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[49] R N Battista,et al. The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[50] A. Culyer. Involving stakeholders in healthcare decisions--the experience of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England and Wales. , 2005, Healthcare quarterly.