Processing load and the use of concrete representations and strategies for solving linear equations

This paper is a report of students' responses to instruction which was based on the use of concrete representations to solve linear equations. The sample consisted of 21 Grade 8 students from a middle-class suburban state secondary school with a reputation for high academic standards and innovative mathematics teaching. The students were interviewed before and after instruction. Interviews and classroom interactions were observed and videotaped. A qualitative analysis of the responses revealed that students did not use the materials in solving problems. The increased processing load caused by concrete representations is hypothesised as a reason.

[1]  H. Martyn Cundy.  What Is X , 1959 .

[2]  John J. Clement,et al.  Learning Without Understanding: The Effects of Tutoring Strategies on Algebra Misconceptions , 1980 .

[3]  Joseph N. Payne.  Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood. , 1975 .

[4]  G. Boulton‐Lewis,et al.  An analysis of young children's strategies and use of devices for length measurement☆ , 1996 .

[5]  Evelyn J. Sowell.  Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction , 1989 .

[6]  Paul Ernest.  Mathematics teaching : the state of the art , 1989 .

[7]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra , 1994 .

[8]  James Hiebert,et al.  A theory of developing competence with written mathematical symbols , 1988 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Some cognitive factors relevant to mathematics instruction , 1992 .

[10]  Carolyn Kieran.  The learning and teaching of school algebra. , 1992 .

[11]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[12]  J. Sweller,et al.  Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. , 1987 .

[13]  An Assessment of the Processing Load of Some Strategies and Representations for Subtraction Used by Teachers and Young Children. , 1993 .

[14]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[15]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Value and Limitations of Analogs in Teaching Mathematics. , 1989 .

[16]  Secondary School Results for the Fourth NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Algebra, Geometry, Mathematical Methods, and Attitudes. , 1988 .

[17]  A. Sfard.  On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[18]  Carolyn Kieran,et al.  Constructing Meaning for the Concept of Equation. , 1979 .

[19]  Gillian Boulton-Lewis,et al.  The processing loads of young children’s and teachers’ representations of place value and implications for teaching , 1992 .

[20]  G. Boulton‐Lewis,et al.  Young children's representations and strategies for addition. , 1994, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Carolyn Kieran,et al.  Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra , 1989 .