The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom

This paper examines the impact of public research and development (R&D) support on cost reducing innovation for wind turbine farms in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom (UK). First we survey the literature in this field. The literature indicates that in Denmark R&D policy has been more successful than in Germany or the UK in promoting innovation of wind turbines. Furthermore, such studies point out that (subsidy-induced) capacity expansions were more effective in the UK and Denmark in promoting cost-reducing innovation than in Germany. The second part of the paper describes the quantitative analysis of the impact of R&D and capacity expansion on innovation. This is calculated using the two-factor learning curve (2FLC) model, in which investment cost reductions are explained by cumulative capacity and the R&D based knowledge stock. Time-series data were collected for the three countries and organized as a panel data set. The parameters of the 2FLC model were estimated, focusing on the homogeneity and heterogeneity of the parameters across countries. We arrived at robust estimations of a learning-by-doing rate of 5.4% and a learning-by-searching rate of 12.6%. The analysis underlines the homogeneity of the learning parameters, enhancing the validity of the 2FLC formulation.

[1]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  THE ENGLAND AND WALES NON-FOSSIL FUEL OBLIGATION: History and Lessons , 2000 .

[2]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies , 1999 .

[3]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[4]  T. Sundqvist,et al.  Valuing the environmental impacts of electricity generation : a critical survey , 2002 .

[5]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model , 2007 .

[6]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan , 2000 .

[7]  M. Lieberman.  The Learning Curve and Pricing in the Chemical Processing Industries , 1984 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[9]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[10]  J. Dutton,et al.  Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity , 1984 .

[11]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[12]  P. Morthorst.  Capacity development and profitability of wind turbines , 1999 .

[13]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy , 2002 .

[14]  Merylyn McKenzie Hedger.  Wind power: challenges to planning policy in the UK , 1995 .

[15]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[16]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Systems option for sustainable development—effect and limit of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry's efforts to substitute technology for energy , 1999 .

[17]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[18]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Experiments with a methodology to model the role of RD first results , 2004 .

[19]  David Elliott.  Renewable energy policy in the UK: Problems and opportunities , 1996 .

[20]  David Elliott,et al.  A fresh start for UK wind power? , 2000 .

[21]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The renewables NFFO: A review , 1995 .