Non-linear modelling of a heaving point absorber: The surge effect

Abstract This paper presents a numerical model that simulates the behaviour of an offshore point absorber wave energy converter (WEC). The model receives 1st order irregular waves as input and delivers instantaneous displacements, velocities and power as output. The model outputs are strongly non-linear due to the nature of some parts of the device, such as the power take off system (PTO), the mooring wires and the drag forces exerted on the wet bodies. Two different devices are modelled, a two-body device consisting in a floating buoy attached to a linear generator placed at the sea bed and a three-body device, which also includes a submerged sphere located halfway from the float and the generator. For each device, the model takes into account either the heave mode only or the heave and surge modes combined. The devices have been tuned to the Mediterranean wave climate, taking particular attention to the floater dimensions and to the geometrical design of the PTO, which has been redesigned to adapt to the newly introduced surge conditions. For the two-body device, although the dynamic behaviour changes when the surge is included, no relevant differences are observed regarding the power production. When studying the three-body device, results show two clear trends. For high waves, the surge leads to a decrease in the production, whereas for smaller waves it affects positively the power absorption. Overall, the negative contribution is more relevant but also less frequent, leading to no substantial change in the power production. Including the surge mode in the model does not give significant variations in production rates and therefore, may be neglected only for energy production assessment. However, it should always be taken into account at the design stage.

[1]  R.P.F. Gomes,et al.  Hydrodynamic optimization of the UGEN: Wave energy converter with U-shaped interior oscillating water column , 2016 .

[2]  이정호,et al.  Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 6th Edition , 2009 .

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  Alessandro Antonini,et al.  Modeling of a Point Absorber for Energy Conversion in Italian Seas , 2013 .

[5]  Malin Göteman,et al.  Optimizing wave energy parks with over 1000 interacting point-absorbers using an approximate analytical method , 2015 .

[6]  Aurélien Babarit,et al.  On the park effect in arrays of oscillating wave energy converters , 2013 .

[7]  Renata Archetti,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Wave Energy Farm in the Western Mediterranean Sea: Comparison Among Different Technologies , 2011 .

[8]  Renata Archetti,et al.  Wave electricity production in Italian offshore: A preliminary investigation , 2014 .

[9]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Farm size comparison with analytical model of linear generator wave energy converters , 2007 .

[10]  J. F. Hauer,et al.  Initial results in Prony analysis of power system response signals , 1990 .

[11]  F. Barbariol,et al.  Improving the assessment of wave energy resources by means of coupled wave-ocean numerical modeling , 2013 .

[12]  Felice Arena,et al.  Wave climate analysis for the design of wave energy harvesters in the Mediterranean Sea , 2015 .

[13]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies , 2010 .

[14]  V. Venugopal,et al.  Optimal configurations of wave energy device arrays , 2010 .

[15]  A. Clément,et al.  Wave energy in Europe: current status and perspectives , 2002 .

[16]  Pasquale Contestabile,et al.  Wave energy potential in the north-west of Sardinia (Italy) , 2013 .

[17]  J. Scruggs,et al.  Harvesting ocean wave energy (Science (1176)) , 2009 .

[18]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Wave heave energy conversion using modular multistability , 2014 .

[19]  H. Keskin Citiroglu,et al.  An approach to wave energy converter applications in Eregli on the western Black Sea coast of Turkey , 2014 .

[20]  M. Leijon,et al.  Wave power absorption : Experiments in open sea and simulation , 2007 .

[21]  A. Akpınar,et al.  Assessment of wave energy resource of the Black Sea based on 15-year numerical hindcast data , 2013 .

[22]  Mats Leijon,et al.  Ocean wave energy absorption in response to wave period and amplitude - offshore experiments on a wave energy converter , 2011 .

[23]  Irina Ivanova,et al.  An electrical approach to wave energy conversion , 2006 .

[24]  A. Carillo,et al.  Wave energy resource assessment in the Mediterranean, the Italian perspective , 2013 .

[25]  L. R. Wilson,et al.  Fingerprints of spatial charge transfer in Quantum Cascade Lasers , 2007, 0708.1274.

[26]  Mile Dragic,et al.  Model tests of Sigma wave energy converter: The lessons learned , 2016 .

[27]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems , 2002 .

[28]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Analysis of dynamic effects relevant for the wear damage in hydraulic machines for wave energy conversion , 2010 .

[29]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Wave energy assessments in the Azores islands , 2012 .

[30]  Alessandro Antonini,et al.  Assessment of the Surge Effects in a Heaving Point Absorber in the Mediterranean Sea , 2014 .

[31]  J. F. Hauer,et al.  Application of Prony analysis to the determination of modal content and equivalent models for measured power system response , 1991 .

[32]  Fredolin Tangang,et al.  Wave energy potential assessment in the central and southern regions of the South China Sea , 2015 .

[33]  M. Leijon,et al.  Wave energy converter with enhanced amplitude response at frequencies coinciding with Swedish west coast sea states by use of a supplementary submerged body , 2009 .

[34]  V. Piscopo,et al.  A new optimization procedure of heaving point absorber hydrodynamic performances , 2016 .

[35]  V. Piscopo,et al.  Towards a cost-based design of heaving point absorbers , 2017 .