Privacy-Preserving Human-Machine Co-existence on Smart Factory Shop Floors

Smart factories are characterized by the presence of both human actors and Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) for the transport of materials. To avoid collisions between workers and AGVs, the latter must be aware of the workers’ location on the shop floor. Wearable devices like smart watches are a viable solution to determine and wirelessly transmit workers’ current location. However, when these locations are sent at regular intervals, workers’ locations and trajectories can be tracked, thus potentially reducing the acceptance of these devices by workers and staff councils. Deliberately obfuscating location information (spatial cloaking) is a widely applied solution to minimize the resulting location privacy implications. However, a number of configuration parameters need to be determined for the safe, yet privacy-preserving, operation of spatial cloaking. We comprehensively analyze the parameter space and derive suitable settings to make smart factories safe and cater to an adequate privacy protection workers.

[1]  Tim Wilmshurst,et al.  [Working time]. , 1984, Sygeplejersken.

[2]  Kenji Mase,et al.  Activity and Location Recognition Using Wearable Sensors , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[3]  Shahrukh A. Irani,et al.  Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress , 2002, Interfaces.

[4]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  USENIX Association , 1992 .

[5]  Hossein Golnabi Role of laser sensor systems in automation and flexible manufacturing , 2003 .

[6]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[7]  Tetsuji Satoh,et al.  An anonymous communication technique using dummies for location-based services , 2005, ICPS '05. Proceedings. International Conference on Pervasive Services, 2005..

[8]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  Facility layout problems: A survey , 2007, Annu. Rev. Control..

[9]  Carmen Constantinescu,et al.  Smart Factory - A Step towards the Next Generation of Manufacturing , 2008 .

[10]  R. Froemke,et al.  GasLab-an Extensible Modeling Toolkit for Exploring Statistical Mechanics , 2009 .

[11]  Walid G. Aref,et al.  Casper*: Query processing for location services without compromising privacy , 2006, TODS.

[12]  Chi-Yin Chow,et al.  Spatial cloaking for anonymous location-based services in mobile peer-to-peer environments , 2011, GeoInformatica.

[13]  Suk-Hwan Suh,et al.  A conceptual framework for the ubiquitous factory , 2012 .

[14]  Constantin Ilas,et al.  Electronic sensing technologies for autonomous ground vehicles: A review , 2013, 2013 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED TOPICS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ATEE).

[15]  Marcel Bogers,et al.  on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation , 2013 The Smart Factory : Exploring Adaptive and Flexible Manufacturing Solutions , 2014 .

[16]  Peter Brandl,et al.  Mensch-zentrierte IKT-Lösungen in einer Smart Factory , 2014, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[17]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  NetLogo: A simple environment for modeling complexity , 2014 .

[18]  Reza B'Far,et al.  Cardea: Cloud based employee health and wellness integrated wellness application with a wearable device and the HCM data store , 2014, 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[19]  M. Weston Wearable surveillance – a step too far? , 2015 .

[20]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Sharing Steps in the Workplace: Changing Privacy Concerns Over Time , 2016, CHI.

[21]  Lucia Lo Bello,et al.  Industrial robotics in factory automation: From the early stage to the Internet of Things , 2017, IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[22]  Nanna Gorm,et al.  Personal Health Tracking Technologies in Practice , 2017, CSCW Companion.

[23]  Sungjoo Hwang,et al.  What drives construction workers' acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace?: Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health , 2017 .