ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy

BackgroundScientists have long been driven by the desire to describe, organize, classify, and compare objects using taxonomies and/or ontologies. In contrast to biology, geology, and many other scientific disciplines, the world of chemistry still lacks a standardized chemical ontology or taxonomy. Several attempts at chemical classification have been made; but they have mostly been limited to either manual, or semi-automated proof-of-principle applications. This is regrettable as comprehensive chemical classification and description tools could not only improve our understanding of chemistry but also improve the linkage between chemistry and many other fields. For instance, the chemical classification of a compound could help predict its metabolic fate in humans, its druggability or potential hazards associated with it, among others. However, the sheer number (tens of millions of compounds) and complexity of chemical structures is such that any manual classification effort would prove to be near impossible.ResultsWe have developed a comprehensive, flexible, and computable, purely structure-based chemical taxonomy (ChemOnt), along with a computer program (ClassyFire) that uses only chemical structures and structural features to automatically assign all known chemical compounds to a taxonomy consisting of >4800 different categories. This new chemical taxonomy consists of up to 11 different levels (Kingdom, SuperClass, Class, SubClass, etc.) with each of the categories defined by unambiguous, computable structural rules. Furthermore each category is named using a consensus-based nomenclature and described (in English) based on the characteristic common structural properties of the compounds it contains. The ClassyFire webserver is freely accessible at http://classyfire.wishartlab.com/. Moreover, a Ruby API version is available at https://bitbucket.org/wishartlab/classyfire_api, which provides programmatic access to the ClassyFire server and database. ClassyFire has been used to annotate over 77 million compounds and has already been integrated into other software packages to automatically generate textual descriptions for, and/or infer biological properties of over 100,000 compounds. Additional examples and applications are provided in this paper.ConclusionClassyFire, in combination with ChemOnt (ClassyFire’s comprehensive chemical taxonomy), now allows chemists and cheminformaticians to perform large-scale, rapid and automated chemical classification. Moreover, a freely accessible API allows easy access to more than 77 million “ClassyFire” classified compounds. The results can be used to help annotate well studied, as well as lesser-known compounds. In addition, these chemical classifications can be used as input for data integration, and many other cheminformatics-related tasks.

[1]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  W. H. Powell,et al.  Nomenclature of organic chemistry : IUPAC recommendations and preferred names 2013 , 2014 .

[3]  Minoru Kanehisa,et al.  KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Midori A. Harris,et al.  OBO-Edit - an ontology editor for biologists , 2007, Bioinform..

[5]  Joanna Stanley,et al.  Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines as Functionally Selective and Orally Bioavailable GABAAα2/α3 Binding Site Agonists for the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders , 2006 .

[6]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Ram Krishnamurthy,et al.  ECMDB: The E. coli Metabolome Database , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  David S. Wishart,et al.  T3DB: the toxic exposome database , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  James Cummings,et al.  THE EIGHTFOLD WAY , 2018, The Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[10]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  Self-organizing ontology of biochemically relevant small molecules , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  Yakov Shafranovich,et al.  Common Format and MIME Type for Comma-Separated Values (CSV) Files , 2005, RFC.

[12]  Rainer Schrader,et al.  Small Molecule Subgraph Detector (SMSD) toolkit , 2009, J. Cheminformatics.

[13]  John H. Fletcher,et al.  The Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry , 1967 .

[14]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Chemical Name to Structure: OPSIN, an Open Source Solution , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  A. J. Cain,et al.  LOGIC AND MEMORY IN LINNAEUS'S SYSTEM OF TAXONOMY. , 1958 .

[16]  Robert Stevens,et al.  Structure-based classification and ontology in chemistry , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[17]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  V. Malyuto,et al.  The technique of automatic quantitative stellar spectral classification using stepwise linear regression , 1989 .

[19]  Gang Fu,et al.  PubChem Substance and Compound databases , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Christoph Steinbeck,et al.  BiNChE: A web tool and library for chemical enrichment analysis based on the ChEBI ontology , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Peter Ertl,et al.  The scaffold tree: an efficient navigation in the scaffold universe. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  Ram Krishnamurthy,et al.  YMDB: the Yeast Metabolome Database , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[26]  W. Bremser.  Hose — a novel substructure code , 1978 .

[27]  Arthur Dalby,et al.  Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at Molecular Design Limited , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[28]  Yuval Ne'eman,et al.  THE EIGHTFOLD WAY , 1965 .

[29]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review , 1997, AI Mag..

[30]  Michel Dumontier,et al.  CO: A chemical ontology for identification of functional groups and semantic comparison of small molecules , 2005, FEBS letters.

[31]  A. Fliri,et al.  Biological spectra analysis: Linking biological activity profiles to molecular structure. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Paul N. Schofield,et al.  The role of ontologies in biological and biomedical research: a functional perspective , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[33]  Harinder P. Singh,et al.  Stellar spectral classification using principal component analysis and artificial neural networks , 1998 .

[34]  F B ROGERS,et al.  Medical Subject Headings , 1948, Nature.

[35]  Timo Böhme,et al.  Automated compound classification using a chemical ontology , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[36]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  The state of art in ontology design , 1997 .

[37]  David James Sherman,et al.  Knowledge-based Generalization of Metabolic Models , 2014, J. Comput. Biol..

[38]  David S. Wishart,et al.  HMDB 3.0—The Human Metabolome Database in 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..