Quantitative carbamylation as a stable isotopic labeling method for comparative proteomics.

A method was developed that uses urea to both solublize and isotopically label biological samples for comparative proteomics. This approach uses either light or heavy urea ((12)CH(4)(14)N(2)O or (13)CH(4)(15)N(2)O, respectively) at a concentration of 8 M and a pH of 7 to dissolve the samples prior to digestion. After the sample is digested using standard proteomic protocols and dried, isotopic labeling is completed by resuspending the sample in a solution of 8 M urea at a pH of 8.5, using the same isotopic species of urea as used for digestion and incubating for 4 h at 80 degrees C. Under these conditions, carbamylation occurs only on the primary amines of the peptides. The effects of complete carbamylation on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOFMS) and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) (collision-induced dissociation (CID)) were examined. Peptides that had a C-terminal carbamylated lysine residue were found to have a reduced intensity when viewed by MALDI-TOFMS. CID of a tryptic peptide that was carbamylated on both the N-terminus and the C-terminus was found to have a more uniform distribution of b- and y-ions, as well as prominent ions from loss of water. Reversed-phase chromatography coupled to ESI-MS/MS was used to identify and quantify the isotopically labeled standard proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA), bovine transferrin, and bovine alpha-casein. Quantitative error between theoretical and observed data ranged from 1.7-10.0%. Relative standard deviations for protein quantitation ranged from 5.2-27.8% over a dynamic range from 0.1-10 (L/H). The development of a method utilizing urea-assisted carbamylation of lysines and N-termini to globally labeled samples for comparative proteomics may prove useful for samples that require a strong chaotrope prior to proteolysis.

[1]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Advances in quantitative proteomics via stable isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[3]  B. Searle,et al.  High-throughput identification of proteins and unanticipated sequence modifications using a mass-based alignment algorithm for MS/MS de novo sequencing results. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  K. Resing,et al.  Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  M. Mann,et al.  Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. V. Van Beeumen,et al.  Mass spectrometric identification of in vivo carbamylation of the amino terminus of Ectothiorhodospira mobilis high-potential iron-sulfur protein, isozyme 1. , 2002, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[7]  G. Stark.  Reactions of cyanate with functional groups of proteins. IV. Inertness of aliphatic hydroxyl groups. Formation of carbamyl- and acylhydantoins. , 1965, Biochemistry.

[8]  H. Wenschuh,et al.  The dominance of arginine-containing peptides in MALDI-derived tryptic mass fingerprints of proteins. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  M. Gorenstein,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  T. Franz,et al.  Threshold values for detergents in protein and peptide samples for mass spectrometry. , 2005, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[11]  T. Shaler,et al.  Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  F. Schütz,et al.  The isomeric transformation of urea into ammonium cyanate in aqueous solutions. , 1948, The Biochemical journal.

[13]  Robert J Chalkley,et al.  Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Protein Mixtures at Low Levels Using Cleavable 13C-Isotope-coded Affinity Tag and Multidimensional Chromatography* , 2003, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  Martin Gilar,et al.  Enzyme-friendly, mass spectrometry-compatible surfactant for in-solution enzymatic digestion of proteins. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  I. Apostol,et al.  Carbamylation of cysteine: a potential artifact in peptide mapping of hemoglobins in the presence of urea. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  Thomas P Conrads,et al.  A detergent‐ and cyanogen bromide‐free method for integral membrane proteomics: Application to Halobacterium purple membranes and the human epidermal membrane proteome , 2004, Proteomics.

[18]  K. Biemann.  Sequencing of peptides by tandem mass spectrometry and high-energy collision-induced dissociation. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  W. Ouyang,et al.  Proteomic profiling of surface proteins on Th1 and Th2 cells. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  G. Bruin,et al.  Influence of solvents and detergents on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry measurements of proteins and oligonucleotides. , 1997, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[21]  G. Stark,et al.  The use of cyanate for the determination of NH2-terminal residues in proteins. , 1963, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  P. Andrews,et al.  Surfactant effects on protein structure examined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  F. Lipmann,et al.  [94A] Carbamyl phosphate , 1957 .

[24]  G. Stark.  ON THE REVERSIBLE REACTION OF CYANATE WITH SULFHYDRYL GROUPS AND THE DETERMINATION OF NH2-TERMINAL CYSTEINE AND CYSTINE IN PROTEINS. , 1964, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  James Walker,et al.  LXXVII.—Transformation of ammonium cyanate into urea , 1895 .

[26]  J. Yates,et al.  A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  T. Lee,et al.  Enzymatic and chemical digestion of proteins for mass spectrometry. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  Natalie G Ahn,et al.  Analysis of membrane proteins from human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells: comparison of extraction methods for multidimensional LC-MS/MS. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[30]  V. N. Lapko,et al.  In vivo carbamylation and acetylation of water‐soluble human lens αB‐crystallin lysine 92 , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  Koichi Tanaka,et al.  Guanidino labeling derivatization strategy for global characterization of peptide mixtures by liquid chromatography matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  G. Stark.  Reactions of cyanate with functional groups of proteins. 3. Reactions with amino and carboxyl groups. , 1965, Biochemistry.

[33]  Yongyi Mao,et al.  Informatics Platform for Global Proteomic Profiling and Biomarker Discovery Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  Shu-Hui Chen,et al.  Stable-isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[35]  G. Stark,et al.  Reactions of the Cyanate Present in Aqueous Urea with Amino Acids and Proteins , 1960 .

[36]  G. Stark.  [72b] Analysis for homocitrulline , 1967 .