The cohesin regulator Stag1 promotes cell plasticity through heterochromatin regulation

Fundamental biological processes such as embryo development and stem cell control rely on cellular plasticity. We present a role for the cohesin regulator, Stag1 in cellular plasticity control via heterochromatin regulation. Stag1 localises to heterochromatin domains and repetitive sequences in embryonic stem (ES) cells and contains intrinsically disordered regions in its divergent terminal ends which promote heterochromatin compaction. ES cells express Stag1 protein isoforms lacking the disordered ends and fluctuations in isoform abundance skews the cell state continuum towards increased differentiation or reprogramming. The role for Stag1 in heterochromatin condensates and nucleolar function is dependent on its unique N-terminus. Stag1NΔ ESCs have decompacted chromatin and reprogram towards totipotency, exhibiting MERVL derepression, reduced nucleolar transcription and decreased translation. Our results move beyond protein-coding gene regulation via chromatin loops into a new role for Stag1 in heterochromatin and nucleolar function and offer fresh perspectives on its contribution to cell identity and disease.

[1]  M. Dawson,et al.  Endogenous retroviruses are a source of enhancers with oncogenic potential in acute myeloid leukaemia , 2020, Nature Communications.

[2]  A. Cuadrado,et al.  Specialized functions of cohesins STAG1 and STAG2 in 3D genome architecture. , 2020, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[3]  Christopher J. Ott,et al.  Cohesin Members Stag1 and Stag2 Display Distinct Roles in Chromatin Accessibility and Topological Control of HSC Self-Renewal and Differentiation. , 2019, Cell stem cell.

[4]  R. Santoro,et al.  Nucleolus and rRNA Gene Chromatin in Early Embryo Development. , 2019, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  D. Surdez,et al.  STAG Mutations in Cancer. , 2019, Trends in cancer.

[6]  J. Herrero,et al.  Enhancer accessibility and CTCF occupancy underlie asymmetric TAD architecture and cell type specific genome topology , 2019, Nature Communications.

[7]  M. Martí-Renom,et al.  Specific Contributions of Cohesin-SA1 and Cohesin-SA2 to TADs and Polycomb Domains in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2019, Cell reports.

[8]  T. Misteli,et al.  Extensive Heterogeneity and Intrinsic Variation in Spatial Genome Organization , 2019, Cell.

[9]  Antonina Hafner,et al.  Visualizing DNA folding and RNA in embryos at single-cell resolution , 2019, Nature.

[10]  E. Meshorer,et al.  Open Chromatin, Epigenetic Plasticity, and Nuclear Organization in Pluripotency. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[11]  Keji Zhao,et al.  Intrinsic Dynamics of a Human Gene Reveal the Basis of Expression Heterogeneity , 2019, Cell.

[12]  G. Papadopoulos,et al.  Microscopy-based chromosome conformation capture enables simultaneous visualization of genome organization and transcription in intact organisms , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  E. Petretto,et al.  Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation , 2018, Nature Immunology.

[15]  Charles H. Li,et al.  Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates , 2018, Science.

[16]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.

[17]  B. Tabak,et al.  Higher-Order Inter-chromosomal Hubs Shape 3D Genome Organization in the Nucleus , 2018, Cell.

[18]  James E. Bradner,et al.  The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation , 2018, Nature Chemical Biology.

[19]  H. Madhani,et al.  Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  A. Tanay,et al.  Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development , 2017, Cell.

[21]  B. Blencowe,et al.  An atlas of alternative splicing profiles and functional associations reveals new regulatory programs and genes that simultaneously express multiple major isoforms , 2017, Genome research.

[22]  Nuno A. Fonseca,et al.  Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal , 2017, Nature.

[23]  M. Tomita,et al.  Dynamic organization of chromatin domains revealed by super-resolution live-cell imaging , 2017 .

[24]  M. Martí-Renom,et al.  Distinct roles of cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in 3D chromosome organization , 2017, bioRxiv.

[25]  Mustafa Mir,et al.  Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation , 2017, Nature.

[26]  Alma L. Burlingame,et al.  Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin , 2017, Nature.

[27]  A. Kornblihtt,et al.  Alternative splicing switches: Important players in cell differentiation , 2017, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  Douglas E. V. Pires,et al.  Familial STAG2 germline mutation defines a new human cohesinopathy , 2017, npj Genomic Medicine.

[29]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  A. Regev,et al.  Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Giacomo Cavalli,et al.  Organization and function of the 3D genome , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  Ricardo J. Miragaia,et al.  MERVL/Zscan4 Network Activation Results in Transient Genome-wide DNA Demethylation of mESCs , 2016, Cell reports.

[33]  M. Wang,et al.  Ubiquitously expressed genes participate in cell‐specific functions via alternative promoter usage , 2016, EMBO reports.

[34]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Building up the nucleus: nuclear organization in the establishment of totipotency and pluripotency during mammalian development , 2016, Genes & development.

[35]  L. Mirny,et al.  The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication , 2016, Cell.

[36]  Juan M. Vaquerizas,et al.  Early embryonic-like cells are induced by downregulating replication-dependent chromatin assembly , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[37]  M. Garcia-Parajo,et al.  Chromatin Fibers Are Formed by Heterogeneous Groups of Nucleosomes In Vivo , 2015, Cell.

[38]  D. Odom,et al.  Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture , 2015, Cell reports.

[39]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[40]  S. Morrison,et al.  Cellular Differences in Protein Synthesis Regulate Tissue Homeostasis , 2014, Cell.

[41]  Q. Qu,et al.  Structure of cohesin subcomplex pinpoints direct shugoshin–Wapl antagonism in centromeric cohesion , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[42]  R. Jessberger,et al.  Meiotic cohesin STAG3 is required for chromosome axis formation and sister chromatid cohesion , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[43]  Jan Padeken,et al.  Nucleolus and nuclear periphery: velcro for heterochromatin. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  Petra C. Schwalie,et al.  Co-binding by YY1 identifies the transcriptionally active, highly conserved set of CTCF-bound regions in primate genomes , 2013, Genome Biology.

[45]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Boris Lenhard,et al.  Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments , 2013, Genome research.

[47]  G. Schroth,et al.  Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[48]  Susan Smith,et al.  SA1 binds directly to DNA through its unique AT-hook to promote sister chromatid cohesion at telomeres , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[49]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.

[50]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[51]  Bas van Steensel,et al.  Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes , 2013, Cell.

[52]  D. Pisano,et al.  A unique role of cohesin‐SA1 in gene regulation and development , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[53]  M. Blasco,et al.  Cohesin‐SA1 deficiency drives aneuploidy and tumourigenesis in mice due to impaired replication of telomeres , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[54]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[55]  Jeffrey L. Wrana,et al.  An Alternative Splicing Switch Regulates Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency and Reprogramming , 2011, Cell.

[56]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Specific Sites in the C Terminus of CTCF Interact with the SA2 Subunit of the Cohesin Complex and Are Required for Cohesin-Dependent Insulation Activity , 2011, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[57]  Alexander R. Pico,et al.  Alternative splicing regulates mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  J. Rossant,et al.  Global Chromatin Architecture Reflects Pluripotency and Lineage Commitment in the Early Mouse Embryo , 2010, PloS one.

[59]  A. Conesa,et al.  Initial Genomics of the Human Nucleolus , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[60]  Susan Smith,et al.  Differential regulation of telomere and centromere cohesion by the Scc3 homologues SA1 and SA2, respectively, in human cells , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  P. Fraser,et al.  Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus , 2009, Nature.

[62]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Architectural roles of multiple chromatin insulators at the human apolipoprotein gene cluster , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[63]  L. Wessels,et al.  Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions , 2008, Nature.

[64]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor , 2008, Nature.

[65]  Stephan Sauer,et al.  Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms , 2008, Cell.

[66]  Michael B. Eisen,et al.  Association of cohesin and Nipped-B with transcriptionally active regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome , 2008, Chromosoma.

[67]  Kathryn E. Crosier,et al.  Cohesin-dependent regulation of Runx genes , 2007, Development.

[68]  Gary J. Jones.  A unique role? , 2007, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[69]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[71]  Zoran Obradovic,et al.  Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence , 2003, Proteins.