Toward an Operational Proxy for Acquisition Workforce Quality: Measuring Dynamic Knowledge and Performance at the Tactical Edges of Organizations

Abstract : The efficacy of defense acquisition is highly dependent upon acquisition workforce (AWF) quality, but assessing such quality remains a major challenge, particularly given the knowledge-intensive and dynamic nature of acquisition organizations and processes. Hence, it is difficult to gauge--much less predict--the impact of leadership interventions in terms of policy, process, regulation, organization, education, training, or like approaches. Building upon the development and application of Knowledge Flow Theory over the past couple of decades, we have developed a state-of-the-art approach that enables us analyze, visualize, and measure dynamic knowledge and performance. The main idea is to apply this approach inwardly to measure the dynamic knowledge and performance of acquisition processes (e.g., within contracting and project management organizations), but we also look outwardly (e.g., at warfare processes at the tactical edges of military combat organizations) to conceptualize an operational proxy for acquisition workforce quality: end customer performance. This proxy offers its best potential to complement, not replace, other metrics in use, development, and conceptualization today, but it arguably concentrates on one of the most important AWF quality determinants: how acquired systems affect operational performance.

[1]  John T. Dillard,et al.  Determining the best Loci of knowledge, responsibilities and decision rights in major acquisition organizations , 2005 .

[2]  Tim Dowd Obtaining Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending , 2011 .

[3]  P. Saviotti On the dynamics of appropriability, of tacit and of codified knowledge , 1998 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[6]  R. Ibrahim,et al.  Discontinuity in Organizations: Developing a Knowledge-Based Organizational Performance Model for Discontinuous Membership , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Keith F. Snider,et al.  Beyond the Body of Knowledge: A Knowledge-Flow Approach to Project Management Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[8]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[9]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[10]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  An Extended Model of Knowledge-Flow Dynamics , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[12]  Madely du Preez Harnessing Knowledge Dynamics: Principled Organizational Knowing & Learning , 2007 .

[13]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Dynamic Knowledge Patterns to Inform Design: A Field Study of Knowledge Stocks and Flows in an Extreme Organization , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  John T. Dillard Centralized Control of Defense Acquisition Programs: A Comparative Review of the Framework from 1987 - 2003 , 2003 .

[15]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .