RhBMP-2 Is Superior to Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Long Fusions to the Sacrum in Adult Spinal Deformity: 4- to 14-Year Follow-up

Study Design. Matched cohort comparison. Objective. To compare the use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) or iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) on the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing long fusions to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity. Summary of Background Data. No long-term studies beyond a 2-year follow-up have been performed comparing the use of BMP versus ICBG for fusion rates in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Methods. A total of 63 consecutive patients, from 1997–2006, comprised of 31 patients in the BMP group and 32 patients in the ICBG group, operated on at a single institution with a minimum 4-year follow-up (4–14 yr) were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were ambulators who were candidates for long fusions (thoracic as the upper level) to the sacrum. Exclusion criteria were revisions, neuromuscular scoliosis, ankylosing spondylitis, and patients who had both BMP and ICBG used for fusion. Oswestry Disability Index and 3 domains of the Scoliosis Research Society score were used to assess outcomes. Results. The 2 groups were similar with respect to age, sex, smoking history, comorbidities, BMI, number of fusion levels and Cobb angles. Eight patients in the BMP group underwent a posterior only, whereas 23 underwent combined anterior and posterior (A/P) surgery. All 32 patients in the ICBG had A/P fusion. The average BMP level was 11.1 mg (3–36 mg). The rate pseudarthrosis was 6.4% (2/31) in the BMP and 28.1% (9/32) in the ICBG group (P = 0.04) using Fisher exact test and odds ratio = 5.67. The fusion rates for BMP group were 93.5% and 71.9% for the ICBG group. Oswestry Disability Indexes were similar between groups. However, the BMP group demonstrated superior sum composite Scoliosis Research Society scores in pain, self-image and function domains (P = 0.02). Conclusion. BMP is superior to ICBG in achieving fusion in long constructs in adult deformity surgery. The rate of pseudarthrosis was significantly higher in the ICBG group than BMP group. The concentration and dosage of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) used seems to have an effect on the rate of fusion and pseudarthrosis rate because no patient receiving more than 5 mg per level had apparent or detected pseudarthroses (n = 20/20). Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Does Bone Morphogenetic Protein Increasethe Incidence of Perioperative Complicationsin Spinal Fusion?: A Comparison of 55,862 Cases of Spinal Fusion With and Without Bone Morphogenetic Protein , 2011, Spine.

[2]  J. Buchowski,et al.  Long Adult Spinal Deformity Fusion to the Sacrum Using rhBMP-2 Versus Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft , 2009, Spine.

[3]  James D. Schwender,et al.  Complications in Long Fusions to the Sacrum for Adult Scoliosis: Minimum Five-Year Analysis of Fifty Patients , 2008, Spine.

[4]  K. Lewandrowski,et al.  Vertebral osteolysis after posterior interbody lumbar fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2: a report of five cases. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Joseph D. Smucker,et al.  Increased Swelling Complications Associated With Off-Label Usage of rhBMP-2 in the Anterior Cervical Spine , 2006, Spine.

[7]  S. Glassman,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Success at 2 Years of Single-Level Instrumented Posterolateral Fusions With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2/Compression Resistant Matrix Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft , 2006, Spine.

[8]  J. McClellan,et al.  Vertebral Bone Resorption After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bone Morphogenetic Protein (rhBMP-2) , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[9]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in Long Adult Spinal Deformity Instrumentation and Fusion to the Sacrum: Prevalence and Risk Factor Analysis of 144 Cases , 2006, Spine.

[10]  Joseph D. Smucker,et al.  Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 as an Adjunct in Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Prospective CT-Scan Analysis at One and Two Years , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  S. Glassman,et al.  Adverse Effects Associated With High-Dose Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Use in Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion , 2006, Spine.

[13]  L. Lenke,et al.  Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Adult Spinal Deformity , 2005, Spine.

[14]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Initial Fusion Rates With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2/Compression Resistant Matrix and a Hydroxyapatite and Tricalcium Phosphate/Collagen Carrier in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion , 2005, Spine.

[15]  J. Burkus,et al.  Use of rhBMP-2 in combination with structural cortical allografts: clinical and radiographic outcomes in anterior lumbar spinal surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  L. Lenke,et al.  Pseudarthrosis in Primary Fusions for Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[17]  C. Branch,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  S. Boden,et al.  Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 to Achieve Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion in Humans: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial 2002 Volvo Award in Clinical Studies , 2002, Spine.

[19]  H. Sandhu,et al.  Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spinal Fusion Applications , 2002, Spine.

[20]  J. Michael Kabo,et al.  Histologic Evaluation of the Efficacy of rhBMP-2 Compared With Autograft Bone in Sheep Spinal Anterior Interbody Fusion , 2002, Spine.

[21]  Kelly M Malloy,et al.  Autograft versus Allograft in Degenerative Cervical Disease , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  J. Fischgrund,et al.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 and tantalum in a goat model. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  L. Lenke,et al.  Long-Term Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Having Combined Surgery: A Comparison of Primary to Revision Patients , 2001, Spine.

[24]  J. Kostuik,et al.  Pseudarthrosis Repair: Autogenous Iliac Crest Versus Femoral Ring Allograft , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  J. Fischgrund,et al.  The Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP‐2) to Promote Spinal Fusion in a Nonhuman Primate Anterior Interbody Fusion Model , 1999, Spine.

[26]  S. Boden,et al.  Laparoscopic anterior spinal arthrodesis with rhBMP-2 in a titanium interbody threaded cage. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[27]  Zhu Shou-rong Complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under straight view , 2013 .

[28]  D. Grob,et al.  Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spinet , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.