Innovative acrylic thermoplastic composites versus conventional composites: Improving the impact performances

Abstract This study focuses on the benefits to the mechanical performance against impact loading offered by glass fiber reinforced (GFR) acrylic thermoplastic polymers, based on new room temperature cure methyl-methacrylate (MMA) matrix. Glass fiber reinforcement is a common solution for a wide variety of engineering applications based on thermoset matrices. However, its use presents some disadvantages such as adequate control of manufacturing temperature, problematic recycling and low damage tolerance. In contrast, acrylic polymers presents a high potential as an alternative matrix for thermoset composites due to their superior mechanical properties, manufacturing at low temperatures and recycled possibilities. In order to compare the mechanical behavior under impact loading of acrylic thermoplastic composites versus conventional composites, Charpy impact test and low velocity impact tests are carried out. The GFR acrylic laminate composites considered are compared to conventional composites manufactured with epoxy and polyester resins in terms of impact resistance and damage evolution. This study covers an impact energy rate from 10 to 60 J and analyses the maximum load, deflection, absorbed energy and associated damage, showing a better performance of the new GFR acrylic thermoplastic polymers with respect to conventional GFR composites.

[1]  U. Sundararaj,et al.  Mode-I interlaminar fracture behaviour of nanoparticle modified epoxy/basalt fibre-reinforced laminates , 2013 .

[2]  L. Avérous,et al.  Renewable biocomposites based on cellulose fibers and dimer fatty acid polyamide: Experiments and modeling of the stress-strain behavior , 2017 .

[3]  M. Rink,et al.  Time dependent fracture behaviour of a carbon fibre composite based on a (rubber toughened) acrylic polymer , 2016 .

[4]  T. Pardoen,et al.  Influence of thermoplastic diffusion on morphology gradient and on delamination toughness of RTM-manufactured composites , 2015 .

[5]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Impact response of Kevlar composites with nanoclay enhanced epoxy matrix , 2013 .

[6]  S. Kuwashiro,et al.  Carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites from acrylic polymer matrices: Interfacial adhesion and physical properties , 2017 .

[7]  M. Ghasemi-Nejhad,et al.  Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites , 1990 .

[8]  Philippe Viot,et al.  Low velocity impact response and damage of laminate composite glass fibre/epoxy based tri-block copolymer , 2015 .

[9]  J. Boisse,et al.  Mesoscopic strain field analysis in a woven composite using a spectral solver and 3D-DIC measurements , 2017 .

[10]  Y. Koutsawa,et al.  A numerical homogenization of E-glass/acrylic woven composite laminates: Application to low velocity impact , 2018, Composite Structures.

[11]  L. Avérous,et al.  Renewable thermoplastic multiphase systems from dimer fatty acids, with mineral microfillers , 2016 .

[12]  A. Yee,et al.  Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies , 1989 .

[13]  P. Chevrier,et al.  Temperature measurements on ES steel sheets subjected to perforation by hemispherical projectiles , 2010 .

[14]  Raymond A. Pearson,et al.  The toughening mechanism in hybrid epoxy-silica-rubber nanocomposites (HESRNs) , 2010 .

[15]  Bulent Murat Icten,et al.  An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates , 2009 .

[16]  M. Rink,et al.  Fracture initiation and propagation in unidirectional CF composites based on thermoplastic acrylic resins , 2017 .

[17]  M. Rodríguez-Millán,et al.  Low temperature effect on impact energy absorption capability of PEEK composites , 2015 .

[18]  P. Viot,et al.  Preparation and mechanical characterisation of laminate composites made of glass fibre/epoxy resin filled with tri bloc copolymers , 2014 .

[19]  Y. Meshaka,et al.  Influence of the fiber/matrix strength on the mechanical properties of a glass fiber/thermoplastic-matrix plain weave fabric composite , 2015 .

[20]  S. Joshi,et al.  Mode I fracture toughness and fractographic investigation of carbon fibre composites with liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix , 2018 .

[21]  P. Viot,et al.  Effect of block copolymer nano-reinforcements on the low velocity impact response of sandwich structures , 2014 .

[22]  A. Rusinek,et al.  Mechanical impact behavior of polyether–ether–ketone (PEEK) , 2015 .

[23]  A. Arias,et al.  A hyperelastic-thermoviscoplastic constitutive model for semi-crystalline polymers: Application to PEEK under dynamic loading conditions , 2017 .

[24]  A. Rusinek,et al.  The dynamic behavior of poly (methyl methacrylate) based nano-rubbers subjected to impact and perforation: Experimental investigations , 2018, Mechanics of Materials.

[25]  A. Yee,et al.  Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies , 1986 .

[26]  A. Salehi‐Khojin,et al.  Low-velocity impact of nanocomposite and polymer plates , 2005 .

[27]  R. M. Boumbimba,et al.  Glass fibres reinforced acrylic thermoplastic resin-based tri-block copolymers composites: Low velocity impact response at various temperatures , 2017 .

[28]  C. Plummer,et al.  Microdeformation mechanisms in rubber toughened PMMA and PMMA-based copolymers , 2006 .

[29]  L. Avérous,et al.  Renewable biocomposites of dimer fatty acid-based polyamides with cellulose fibres: Thermal, physical and mechanical properties , 2010 .

[30]  L. Avérous,et al.  Elaboration, morphology and properties of renewable thermoplastics blends, based on polyamide and polyurethane synthesized from dimer fatty acids , 2015 .

[31]  S. Joshi,et al.  Low-velocity impact response of carbon fibre composites with novel liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix , 2018, Composite Structures.

[32]  A. Arias,et al.  Investigation of mechanical impact behavior of short carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK composites , 2015 .

[33]  M. Rodríguez-Millán,et al.  Experimental Study on the Perforation Process of 5754-H111 and 6082-T6 Aluminium Plates Subjected to Normal Impact by Conical, Hemispherical and Blunt Projectiles , 2014 .

[34]  Z. Xin,et al.  Morphology and mechanical properties of nanostructured blends of epoxy resin with poly(ɛ-caprolactone)-block-poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile)-block-poly(ɛ-caprolactone) triblock copolymer , 2009 .