The acoustic realization of vowels of Shanghai Chinese

Abstract This study aims to understand the phonological vowel inventory and the phonetic implementation of vowel categories in Shanghai Chinese by examining the acoustic realization of two complementary sets of vowels in the language, one set appearing in open syllables (OSVs) and the other in closed syllables with a glottal coda (CSVs). Two factors—consonant onset and prominence level—were controlled. Results confirmed that OSVs were longer than CSVs (by an average factor of 1.5) and were realized with a more expanded acoustic vowel space. Detailed analyses of the vowel formant data suggested that CSVs cannot be the reduced realization of OSVs. Instead, the seemingly spectral reduction of CSVs is an inherent feature of the vowel's phonetic implementation, in contrast to the more static spectral patterns of the OSVs. Such a spectral change of CSVs is proposed to be a speaker-controlled process, the purpose of which is to maximally differentiate CSVs from OSVs, the two sub-systems of the vowels of the language.

[1]  P. Ladefoged.  Three areas of experimental phonetics , 1967 .

[2]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Phonetic structures of Aleut , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[3]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[4]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[5]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  I. Maddieson,et al.  An exploration of phonation types in Wu dialects of Chinese , 1992 .

[7]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Acoustic Vowel Reduction in Creek: Effects of Distinctive Length and Position in the Word , 2000, Phonetica.

[8]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[10]  B. Lindblom.  Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[11]  K. D. Jong.  The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[12]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[13]  W. Strange,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Taehong Cho.  Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..

[17]  M. Fourakis,et al.  Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Lobanov.  Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers , 1971 .

[20]  D. Broad,et al.  Formant-frequency trajectories in selected CVC-syllable nuclei. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Sandra E. Trehub,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts. , 1973 .

[22]  P. Kuhl.  Speech perception in early infancy: perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Vowel Variation in Japanese , 1984 .

[24]  M. Beckman,et al.  Articulatory Timing and the Prosodic Interpretation of Syllable Duration , 1988 .

[25]  Gary Weismer,et al.  The effect of intertalker speech rate variation on acoustic vowel space. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Donna Erickson,et al.  Articulation of Extreme Formant Patterns for Emphasized Vowels , 2002, Phonetica.

[27]  S. Zahorian,et al.  Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic Structures of Scottish Gaelic , 1998, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[30]  Tense / lax vowel classification usin , 2003 .

[31]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[32]  W Strange,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated German vowels: perceptual and acoustical studies. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .

[34]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  How to organize a fairly large vowel inventory: the vowels of Fering (North Frisian) , 2004, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[35]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[36]  M. Beckman,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics , 1992 .

[37]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Anja K. Steinlen.  The influence of consonants on native and non-native vowel production : a cross-linguistic study , 2005 .

[39]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems , 1997 .

[40]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[41]  D. V. Bergem.  Acoustic and Lexical Vowel Reduction , 1995 .

[42]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Enhanced contrast for vowels in utterance focus: a cross-language study. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Christian Abry,et al.  Major trends in vowel system inventories , 1997 .

[44]  Roel Smits,et al.  A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  P. Morse,et al.  Continuous vowel discrimination in normal and at risk infants. , 1976, Child development.

[46]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification , 1986 .

[47]  W R TIFFANY,et al.  Nonrandom sources of variation in vowel quality. , 1959, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  K. Stevens,et al.  Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[49]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Vowels of the world''''s languages , 1990 .

[50]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[52]  John Fitch,et al.  Course notes , 1975, SIGS.

[53]  B. Lindblom.  Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .