Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with Implicit Travel Time Budget Constraint

Although time constraints on travel behavior have been widely recognized, little effort has been made to incorporate such constraints into the traditional stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) framework. The major objective of this research is to fill this gap by incorporating travel time constraints into the SUE model by means of a nonlinear perceived travel time function. This modified model, designated the travel time budget model, focuses primarily on discretionary travel behavior (such as shopping trips) and hence also allows the possibility of deferring travel decisions by incorporating an additional choice alternative designated the shop-less-frequently alternative. This model is compared with the traditional SUE model by using a simulated travel scenario on a test network designed to reflect a practical planning situation. The simulation shows that when attractiveness levels are increased by the introduction of a new shopping opportunity, the presence of travel time constraints can lead to significantly smaller predicted travel volumes than those of the traditional SUE model. More important, it shows that the overall pattern of travel can be quite different. In particular, travel to the shopping destination with enhanced attractiveness can actually decrease for some origin locations. The findings suggest that when an attempt is made to evaluate the impact of planning alternatives on future traffic patterns, it is vital to consider not only the cost of time itself but also the time trade-offs between travel and other human activities.

[1]  David A. Hensher,et al.  VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS. A DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1985 .

[2]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  AN EFFICIENT APPROACH TO SOLVING THE ROAD NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1975 .

[3]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Yacov Zahavi,et al.  TRAVELTIME BUDGETS AND MOBILITY IN URBAN AREAS , 1974 .

[5]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Studies in the Economics of Transportation. , 1956 .

[6]  A. Schäfer REGULARITIES IN TRAVEL DEMAND: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[7]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  10 Modelling Non-Work Destination Choices with Choice Sets Defined by Travel-Time Constraints , .

[8]  G. Hupkes THE LAW OF CONSTANT TRAVEL TIME AND TRIP-RATES , 1982 .

[9]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Stochastic network equilibrium with multiple vehicle types and asymmetric , 1983 .

[10]  David Bernstein,et al.  The Traffic Equilibrium Problem with Nonadditive Path Costs , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[11]  J. Prashker,et al.  EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY CONSTRAINED CHOICE SETS TO SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELLING , 1982 .

[12]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Modelling Non-Work Destination Choices with Choice Sets Defined by Travel-Time Constraints: Advances in Spatial Science , 1997 .

[13]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment , 1977 .

[14]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[15]  Yujia Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MEASURING SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY WITHIN DYNAMIC FLOW TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS , 2001 .