Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind?

The development of inland freight distribution systems has been an active strategy to promote the hinterland of maritime gateways around the world. While differences can be observed among North-American and European hinterlands, the setting and development of rail-based dry ports in those regions come in many forms and shapes. This paper demonstrates that the observed similarities and differences are the result of the regional and local governance and regulatory settings, the types and strategies of stakeholders involved, the spatial and functional relations with adjacent and or distant gateway ports, the dynamics in logistics network configurations, the specific competitive setting (i.e. competition with trucking and barges in Europe) and the imperatives in rail operations. In spite of the technical similarities brought by intermodalism, European and North American dry ports are functionally two of a kind since they play different roles within their respective transport and supply chains.

[1]  E. Gouvernal,et al.  Intermodal Rail in Western Europe: Actors and Services in a New Regulatory Environment , 2006 .

[2]  Theo Notteboom Bundling of Freight Flows and Hinterland Network Developments , 2008 .

[3]  Violeta Roso,et al.  The Dry Port concept - Applications in Sweden , 2005 .

[4]  Theo Notteboom The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains: european challenges , 2009 .

[5]  M. Brooks North American Freight Transportation: The Road to Security and Prosperity , 2008 .

[6]  A. Ng,et al.  Government policies, efficiency and competitiveness: The case of dry ports in India , 2009 .

[7]  A. Ng,et al.  The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies: The Brazilian experience , 2012 .

[8]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport , 2008 .

[9]  T. Notteboom De invloed van ruimtelijke en logistieke ontwikkelingen in het voorland-achterlandcontinuüm op de positie en functie van zeehavens , 2003 .

[10]  Giovanni Ridolfi,et al.  Intermodel transportation in Europe: of Modes, corridors and nodes , 1994 .

[11]  Peter W. de Langen,et al.  Hinterland access regimes in seaports , 2003, Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport - Scientific Papers in Transportation.

[12]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  The Thruport concept and transmodal rail freight distribution in North America , 2008 .

[13]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Terminals within North American and European Supply Chains , 2009 .

[14]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  COMPARATIVE NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN GATEWAY LOGISTICS: THE REGIONALISM OF FREIGHT DISTRIBUTION , 2010 .

[15]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland , 2009 .

[16]  R Harrison,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF INLAND PORTS , 2001 .

[17]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  Locational Characteristics of Dry Ports in Developing Economies: Some Lessons from Northern India , 2012 .

[18]  Ehsan Dadvar,et al.  Feasibility of establishment of “Dry Ports” in the developing countries—the case of Iran , 2011 .

[19]  Quynh-Lam Ngoc Le,et al.  A consideration for developing a dry port system in Indochina area , 2011 .

[20]  Peter W Cardebring,et al.  COMBI-TERMINAL AND INTERMODAL FREIGHT CENTRE DEVELOPMENT: AN ASSESSMENT. , 1995 .

[21]  Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas,et al.  Research on Dry Port Concept as Intermodal Node , 2007 .

[22]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships , 2009 .

[23]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[24]  S. Dennis CHANGES IN RAILROAD RATES SINCE THE STAGGERS ACT , 2001 .

[25]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  INTERMODAL FREIGHT TERMINALS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE TERMINAL MARKET , 1999 .

[26]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  The development of the Yangtze River container port system , 2011 .

[27]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Network dynamics in container transport by barge , 2004 .

[28]  P. D. de Langen,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[29]  B. Slack Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? , 1999 .

[30]  Rob Zuidwijk,et al.  The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports , 2012 .

[31]  Peter J. Rimmer,et al.  China’s container-related dynamics, 1990–2005 , 2009 .

[32]  R. F. Poist,et al.  North American inland port development: international vs domestic shipper preferences , 2004 .

[33]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update , 2010 .

[34]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Container river services and gateway ports: Similarities between the Yangtze River and the Rhine River , 2007 .

[35]  E. Gouvernal,et al.  Container Railfreight Services in North‐west Europe: Diversity of Organizational Forms in a Liberalizing Environment , 2005 .

[36]  Girish Gujar,et al.  The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India , 2009 .