Dynamic creep and mechanical characteristics of SmartSet GHV bone cement

The restrained dynamic creep behaviour and mechanical properties of SmartSet GHV bone cement have been investigated at both room temperature and body temperature. It was found that the bone cement behaves significant differently at room temperature from that at body temperature. The test temperature had a strong effect on the creep performance of the bone cements with a higher creep rate observed at body temperature at each loading cycle. For both temperatures, two stages of creep were identified with a higher creep rate during early cycling followed by a steady state creep rate. The relationship between creep deformation and loading cycle can be expressed by a Hyperb 1 model. As a visco-elastic material, the sensitivity of bone cement to the temperature change was evident during mechanical testing. Compared to the mechanical strength at room temperature, a decreased value was demonstrated at body temperature. The bending modulus was very sensitive to the change in testing temperature, where a reduction of 52% was recorded. A significant reduction in compressive and bending strength, 31 and 23% were recorded respectively. The effect of temperature on bending strength was less apparent, where only 13% reduction was exhibited at body temperature compared to room temperature.

[1]  J. Older,et al.  Implant Bone Interface , 1990, Springer London.

[2]  C. Vallo Flexural strength distribution of a PMMA-based bone cement. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  D J Chwirut,et al.  Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  A. J. Lee,et al.  Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. , 1988, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[5]  V. Kish,et al.  Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  G. Lewis Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  A J Lee,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone cements. , 1977, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  S. Pal,et al.  Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  J. P. Davies,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular, and LVC bone cements. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  A. Culyer,et al.  Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[11]  T. Slooff,et al.  Characterization of bone cements. , 1975, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  A. J. Lee,et al.  Time-Dependent Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement , 1990 .

[13]  H. Mckellop,et al.  Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  R. Kusy Characterization of self-curing acrylic bone cements. , 1978, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  R. Huiskes Mechanical failure in total hip arthroplasty with cement , 1993 .

[18]  A. McCaskie,et al.  Creep behavior comparison of CMW1 and palacos R-40 clinical bone cements , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  G. Marshall,et al.  Mechanical strength of acrylic bone cements impregnated with antibiotics. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  Sarah Green,et al.  Effect of restraint on the creep behavior of clinical bone cement , 2002 .

[21]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Optimization of benzoyl peroxide concentration in an experimental bone cement based on poly(methyl methacrylate) , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[22]  A. McCaskie,et al.  Some failure modes of four clinical bone cements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  I. Heger,et al.  The mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long-term results , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[24]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: the effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.