Combined In Vitro Tests as an Alternative to In Vivo Eye Irritation Tests

Accurate methods that test the eye irritation potential of chemicals, which do not involve the use of animals, are needed to meet new regulatory standards. We evaluated the applicability and predictive capacity of five in vitro tests for eye irritation: the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay; the Chorioallantoic Membrane-Trypan Blue Staining (CAM-TBS) assay; the Fluorescein Leakage Test (FLT); the 3T3-Neutral Red Uptake (3T3-NRU) cytotoxicity assay; and the red blood cell (RBC) haemolysis assay. A panel of 16 chemicals (some at multiple concentrations) was assessed by using the five tests, and the results were compared with historical in vivo Draize test data. The results showed rank correlation and class concordance between the five alternative methods and the Draize test for the 16 chemicals. These in vitro assays had good predictive capacity, reproducibility and reliability when compared to the Draize test. The best relationship was between the HET-CAM, CAM-TBS and FLT results, and the modified maximum average score(s) (MMAS). A prediction model (PM) was developed, based on the maximum possible correlation between the MMAS and the HET-CAM, CAM-TBS and FLT results. The PM had a good predictive capacity when compared to the results of animal tests, indicating its potential value for the in vitro screening of chemicals for eye irritation effects.

[1]  M Liebsch,et al.  Modern biostatistical methods for assessing in vitro/in vivo correlation of severely eye irritating chemicals in a validation study of in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye test. , 1995, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[2]  H. Kojima,et al.  Evaluation of seven alternative assays on the main ingredients in cosmetics as predictors of Draize eye irritation scores. , 1995, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  P. Botham,et al.  IRAG working group 3. Cell function-based assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group. , 1997, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[4]  D M Bagley,et al.  Eye irritation: updated reference chemicals data bank. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[5]  Li Xie,et al.  Microelectronic cell sensor assay for detection of cytotoxicity and prediction of acute toxicity. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[6]  D. Acosta,et al.  IRAG working group 4: Cell cytotoxicity assays , 1997 .

[7]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Alternative (non-animal) methods for chemicals testing: Current status and future prospects - Overview , 2002 .

[8]  O. Meyer.  Testing and assessment strategies, including alternative and new approaches. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[9]  Nadia Dami,et al.  Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition. , 2005, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  M. Vinardell,et al.  Potential eye irritation of some "biodegradable" liquid scintillation cocktails determined in vitro. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[11]  D. Acosta,et al.  IRAG working group 4. Cell cytotoxicity assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group. , 1997, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[12]  H. Hensen,et al.  Comparative studies on the ocular and dermal irritation potential of surfactants. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[13]  Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HETCAM and neutral red uptake tests. , 2001, In vitro & molecular toxicology.

[14]  I Gerner,et al.  Interlaboratory assessment of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany. , 1991, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  P. Ferret,et al.  Assessment of the phototoxic hazard of some essential oils using modified 3T3 neutral red uptake assay. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[17]  H. Abdi.  Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS Regression) , 2010 .

[18]  V. E. Vinzi,et al.  PLS regression, PLS path modeling and generalized Procrustean analysis: a combined approach for multiblock analysis , 2005 .

[19]  K R Wilhelmus,et al.  The Draize eye test. , 2001, Survey of ophthalmology.

[20]  H. Abdi.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression. , 2003 .

[21]  M. Vinardell,et al.  Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays. , 2006, Toxicology letters.