Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.

The responses of single cortical neurons were measured as a function of the binocular disparity of dynamic random dot stereograms for a large sample of neurons (n = 787) from V1 of the awake macaque. From this sample, we selected 180 neurons whose tuning curves were strongly tuned for disparity, well sampled and well described by one-dimensional Gabor functions. The fitted parameters of the Gabor functions were used to resolve three outstanding issues in binocular stereopsis. First, we considered whether tuning curves can be meaningfully divided into discrete tuning types. Careful examination of the distributions of the Gabor parameters that determine tuning shape revealed no evidence for clustering. We conclude that a continuum of tuning types is present. Second, we investigated the mechanism of disparity encoding for V1 neurons. The shape of the disparity tuning function can be used to distinguish between position-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by an interocular shift in receptive field position) and phase-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by a difference in the receptive field profile in the 2 eyes). Both position and phase encoding were found to be common. This was confirmed by an independent assessment of disparity encoding based on the measurement of disparity sensitivity for sinusoidal luminance gratings of different spatial frequencies. The contributions of phase and position to disparity encoding were compared by estimating a population average of the rate of change in firing rate per degree of disparity. When this was calculated separately for the phase and position contributions, they were found to be closely similar. Third, we investigated the range of disparity tuning in V1 as a function of eccentricity in the parafoveal range. We find few cells which are selective for disparities greater than +/-1 degrees even at the largest eccentricity of approximately 5 degrees. The preferred disparity was correlated with the spatial scale of the tuning curve, and for most units lay within a +/-pi radians phase limit. Such a size-disparity correlation is potentially useful for the solution of the correspondence problem.

[1]  S. Freguia Researches in Binocular Vision. , 1950 .

[2]  L. Riggs,et al.  Eye Movements Recorded During Convergence and Divergence , 1960 .

[3]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. Fender,et al.  The interplay of drifts and flicks in binocular fixation. , 1969, Vision research.

[5]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Gian F. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of stereopsis in monkey visual cortex , 1979, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  P. O. Bishop NEURAL MECHANISMS FOR BINOCULAR DEPTH DISCRIMINATION , 1981 .

[10]  G. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[12]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[14]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[15]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  S. McKee,et al.  Dichoptic hyperacuity: the precision of nonius alignment. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  DH Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18 , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Binocular co‐ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Levay,et al.  Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex , 1988, Visual Neuroscience.

[21]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[22]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[23]  J. T. Enright Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: Better than stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[24]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure , 1991, Nature.

[25]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Disparity-sensitive cells in the owl have a characteristic disparity , 1993, Nature.

[27]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[28]  H. Smallman,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Gian F. Poggio Mechanisms of Stereopsis in Monkey Visual Cortex , 1995 .

[30]  R D Freeman,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Stereopsis: How Do Simple Cells in the Visual Cortex Encode Binocular Disparity? , 1995, Perception.

[31]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Differences between stereopsis with isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[32]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[34]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Glennerster,et al.  d max for stereopsis and motion in random dot displays , 1998, Vision Research.

[37]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Subregion Correspondence Model of Binocular Simple Cells , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Prince,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in human binocular depth perception , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity: receptive field position versus phase. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[42]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  H. Wagner,et al.  Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  A. Parker,et al.  The Precision of Single Neuron Responses in Cortical Area V1 during Stereoscopic Depth Judgments , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Parker,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of rinocular single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  M. Nomura,et al.  A binocular model for the simple cell , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[48]  B. Frost,et al.  Binocular responses of neurons in the barn owl's visual Wulst , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.