The thin plate as a regularizer in Bayesian SPECT reconstruction

The attractions of the maximum-likelihood (ML) method for SPECT reconstruction, namely accurate system and noise modelling, are tempered by its unstable nature. The variety of Bayesian MAP approaches proposed in recent years can both stabilize the reconstructions and lead to better bias and variance. The authors' own work (see IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, vol. MI-14, no. 4, p. 669-80, Dec. 1995) used a nonquadratic prior (the weak plate) that imposed piecewise smoothness on the first derivative of the solution to achieve results superior to those obtained using a nonquadratic prior (the weak membrane) that imposed piecewise smoothness of the zeroth derivative. By relaxing the requirement of imposing spatial discontinuities and using instead a quadratic (no discontinuities) smoothing prior, algorithms become easier to analyze, solutions easier to compute, and hyperparameter calculation becomes less of a problem. Here, the authors investigated whether the advantages of weak plate relative to weak membrane are retained when non-piecewise quadratic versions-the thin plate and membrane priors-are used. The authors used an EM-OSL (one-step-late) algorithm to compute MAP solutions with both these priors, and found that the thin plate exhibits better bias behaviour than the membrane at little cost in variance. Also, both priors outperform ML-EM in terms of bias and variance if practical stopping criteria are used for ML-EM. The net conclusion is that, while quadratic smoothing priors are not as good as piecewise versions, the simple modification of the membrane model to the thin late model leads to improved reconstructions in edge regions.

[1]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian Reconstruction for Emissiom Tomography via Deterministic Annealing , 1993, IPMI.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Simulation evaluation of Gibbs prior distributions for use in maximum a posteriori SPECT reconstructions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Zhenyu Zhou,et al.  Approximate maximum likelihood hyperparameter estimation for Gibbs priors , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  K. Lange Convergence of EM image reconstruction algorithms with Gibbs smoothing. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[6]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  Image Restoration Using Gibbs Priors: Boundary Modeling, Treatment of Blurring, and Selection of Hyperparameter , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Zhenyu Zhou,et al.  Approximate maximum likelihood hyperparameter estimation for Gibbs priors , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  T. Hebert,et al.  A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[9]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Comparison of the Efficiency of Deterministic and Stochastic Algorithms for Visual Reconstruction , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[12]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[13]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Regularization of Inverse Visual Problems Involving Discontinuities , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[15]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian image reconstruction in SPECT using higher order mechanical models as priors , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  E. Levitan,et al.  A Maximum a Posteriori Probability Expectation Maximization Algorithm for Image Reconstruction in Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Visual Reconstruction , 1987, Deep Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces.

[18]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Maximum likelihood, least squares, and penalized least squares for PET , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  Gene Gindi,et al.  Using Ground-Truth Data To Design Priors In Bayesian Spect Reconstruction , 1995 .