Extended symmetric and asymmetric weight assignment methods in data envelopment analysis

Dual weight restrictions are used to eliminate low discriminatory power in DEA.Weight restriction suffers from infeasibility and lack of exogenous determination.Symmetric Weight Assignment Technique (SWAT) addresses these concerns.We extend the SWAT method by proposing four new DEA models.Symmetric and asymmetric weights are rewarded and penalized in our DEA models. Dual weight restrictions are commonly suggested as a remedy to the problem of low discriminatory power and absurd marginal prices in conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models. However, weight restriction models also suffer from potential problems of infeasibility, lack of exogenous determination and ambiguous interpretations. The Symmetric Weight Assignment Technique (SWAT) addresses these concerns through a symmetric endogenous weight selection process. In this paper, we extend the SWAT method by proposing four new DEA models. Symmetric and asymmetric weights are rewarded and penalized, respectively, in the proposed models. The first model takes into account the symmetrical weights assigned to the outputs in the input-oriented model. The second model takes into account the symmetrical weights assigned to the inputs in the output-oriented model. The third and fourth models simultaneously take into account symmetric inputoutput weights in both the input and output orientations. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed models and the efficacy of the procedures and algorithms with an application to Danish district heating plants.

[1]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA , 1992 .

[2]  Alireza Davoodi,et al.  Some remarks on the two-level DEA model , 2011, Appl. Math. Lett..

[3]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Ratio-based RTS determination in weight-restricted DEA models , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  The law of one price in data envelopment analysis: Restricting weight flexibility across firms , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[10]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  J. Wallenius,et al.  A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[12]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A "peer-restricted" cross-efficiency evaluation , 2011 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[14]  Li Qi,et al.  Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation , 2008 .

[15]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[16]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Economic and environmental efficiency of district heating plants , 2005 .

[17]  Stanko Dimitrov,et al.  Generalized symmetric weight assignment technique: Incorporating managerial preferences in data envelopment analysis using a penalty function , 2013 .

[18]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  Common sets of weights as summaries of DEA profiles of weights: With an application to the ranking of professional tennis players , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR-efficiency of U.S. independent oil/gas producers over time , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Liang Liang,et al.  Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu,et al.  Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[23]  Volker Stix,et al.  A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[24]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Models for measuring and benchmarking olympics achievements , 2008 .

[26]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A data envelopment analysis method with assurance region for weight generation in the analytic hierarchy process , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Chiang Kao,et al.  A linear formulation of the two-level DEA model , 2008 .

[29]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  M. P. Estellita Lins,et al.  Avoiding infeasibility in DEA models with weight restrictions , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  K. Chin,et al.  Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2010 .

[33]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[34]  Rodrigo Cesar Silva,et al.  The Adjusted Spherical Frontier Model with weight restrictions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[36]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[37]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  A Dea Model For Measuring The Relative Eeficiency Of Highway Maintenance Patrols , 1990 .

[38]  Jie Wu,et al.  Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[39]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[40]  Ying Luo,et al.  Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  B. Golany A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis , 1988 .

[43]  Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu,et al.  A systematic procedure to obtain a preferable and robust ranking of units , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[44]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[45]  Jie Wu,et al.  Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  K. J. Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations , 2008 .

[48]  Jie Wu,et al.  Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2008 .

[49]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[50]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[51]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[53]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[54]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation , 2011 .

[55]  Gq Huang,et al.  Computers & Industrial Engineering , 2015 .

[56]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  The measurement of relative efficiency using data envelopment analysis with assurance regions that link inputs and outputs , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[58]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[59]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Structural and behavioral robustness in applied best-practice regulation , 2014 .

[60]  J. S. H. Kornbluth,et al.  Analysing Policy Effectiveness Using Cone Restricted Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[61]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[62]  L. Seiford,et al.  Strict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[63]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Stanko Dimitrov,et al.  Promoting symmetric weight selection in data envelopment analysis: A penalty function approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..