Using the LCP: Bereaved Relatives' Assessments of Communication and Bereavement

The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is aimed at improving care and communication in the dying phase. The authors studied whether use of the LCP affects relatives' retrospective evaluation of communication and their level of bereavement. An intervention study was conducted. During the baseline period, usual care was provided to dying patients. During the intervention period, the LCP was used for 79% of the patients. In total, bereaved relatives filled in a questionnaire for 57% of the patients, on average 4 months after death. In the intervention period, relatives had lower bereavement levels when compared with relatives in the baseline period (P = .01). Communication was evaluated similarly for both periods. We conclude that LCP use during the dying phase seems to moderately contribute to lower levels of bereavement in relatives.

[1]  M. Gilhooly,et al.  Anticipatory grief: a review. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[2]  William A. Knaus,et al.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. , 1995, JAMA.

[3]  J. Mccann.  Bereavement and Adaptation: A Comparative Study of the Aftermath of Death , 1995 .

[4]  P. Martikainen,et al.  Mortality after the death of a spouse: rates and causes of death in a large Finnish cohort. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[5]  I. Higginson,et al.  Predictors of family anxiety in the weeks before bereavement. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[6]  B. Raphael,et al.  A Longitudinal Study Comparing Bereavement Phenomena in Recently Bereaved Spouses, Adult Children and Parents , 1998, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[7]  S. Karlsen,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of postal versus interviewer administration of a questionnaire measuring satisfaction with, and use of, services received in the year before death. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[8]  P. Singer,et al.  Quality end-of-life care: patients' perspectives. , 1999, JAMA.

[9]  Nicholas Christakis,et al.  In Search of a Good Death: Observations of Patients, Families, and Providers , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  J. Teno,et al.  Patient-focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. , 2001, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[11]  C. McPherson,et al.  After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. , 2001, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[12]  J. Carline,et al.  Patients' perspectives on physician skill in end-of-life care: differences between patients with COPD, cancer, and AIDS. , 2002, Chest.

[13]  R. Kessels,et al.  Patients’ Memory for Medical Information , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  Christina Sinding,et al.  Disarmed complaints: unpacking satisfaction with end-of-life care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[15]  J. Ellershaw,et al.  Care of the dying patient: the last hours or days of life. , 2003, BMJ.

[16]  J. Mandelblatt,et al.  The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures , 2004, Palliative medicine.

[17]  T. Morita,et al.  Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  Patient control and end-of-life care. Part II: The patient perspective , 2004 .

[19]  G. van der Wal,et al.  Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making , 2006, Palliative medicine.

[20]  B. Souweine,et al.  A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.